College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 213 players across 8 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, and in Week 1 nobody has current-season form to quote. Any “hits 7 of his last 10” you see on a Week 1 college prop is invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

North Carolina vs TCU

Sat 12:00 PM ETtotal 33.550 props

Jaden CraigTCUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 200 ydsTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct11% of passing production backdrifted -179 → +100
Over-11353.1%Over-11353.1%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%Over-11553.5%Over-11553.5%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%Over-11353.1%Over-11453.3%Over-11553.5%Over-11353.1%Over-11453.3%Over-11353.1%50+-400097.6%75+-2000099.5%100+-250096.2%125+-90090%150+-70087.5%160+-48783%170+-38079.2%172+-11553.5%175+-22569.2%180+-29974.9%184+-11553.5%190+-23970.5%198+-11553.5%200++10050%204+-12054.5%210+-15260.3%213+-12856.1%216+-11553.5%217+-13056.5%219+-12856.1%220+-12255%221+-11453.3%222+-11753.9%223+-12054.5%224+-13256.9%225++45018.2%230++10249.5%240++12544.4%250++25003.8%260++19134.4%270++23429.9%275++160000.6%280++29725.2%290++37421.1%300++110000.9%310++59614.4%320++75011.8%325++110000.9%330++9709.3%340++12407.5%350++50002%375++100001%400++200000.5%
Billy EdwardsUNCPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 180 ydsUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct10% of passing production backbet up +110 → -101
Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%Over-11353.1%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%Over-11353.1%Over-11353.1%Over-11353.1%Over-11353.1%Over-11353.1%Over-11353.1%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%Over-11553.5%75+-600098.4%100+-250096.2%125+-90090%150+-45081.8%160+-15761.1%167+-12154.8%168+-11453.3%170+-12755.9%171+-12255%172+-11854.1%173+-11753.9%174+-11653.7%175+-110091.7%177+-12255%180+-10150.2%190++12245%200+-19566.1%205+-11553.5%210++18535.1%214+-11052.4%220++23130.2%225+-12054.5%226+-11052.4%230++28725.8%240++35821.8%241+-11553.5%250++38020.8%260++56415.1%265+-11553.5%270++71012.3%275++20004.8%280++9109.9%290++11607.9%300++140000.7%325++110000.9%350++40002.4%375++100001%400++160000.6%425++100001%
Jeremy PayneTCURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 133 ydsTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct31% of rushing production back price steady
20+-1000099%25+-470097.9%30+-230095.8%40+-94090.4%50+-48582.9%60+-28173.8%70+-800098.8%78+-11753.9%79+-11753.9%80+-2000099.5%81+-11653.7%90+-200095.2%100+-75088.2%110+-600098.4%117+-11052.4%120+-110091.7%130+-15560.8%131+-12555.6%132+-11553.5%140++21032.3%146+-12054.5%148+-11553.5%150++50016.7%160++10009.1%170++20004.8%180++35002.8%190++60001.6%200++100001%210++180000.6%220++60001.6%230++100001%240++150000.7%250++200000.5%260++60001.6%270++80001.2%280++100001%290++130000.8%300++180000.6%310++180000.6%320++200000.5%
Benjamin HallUNCRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 40 ydsUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct54% of rushing production backbet up +172 → +100
10+-280096.6%15+-260096.3%20+-350097.2%25+-55084.6%29+-12054.5%30+-25571.8%37+-11954.3%38+-11553.5%39+-11954.3%40++10050%42+-12054.5%45+-12054.5%46+-11453.3%47+-11753.9%48+-11854.1%49+-11753.9%50++25028.6%53+-11052.4%55+-11553.5%60++65013.3%70++14006.7%80++25003.8%90++45002.2%100++100001%110++140000.7%120++55001.8%130++80001.2%140++150000.7%150++200000.5%160++180000.6%170++160000.6%180++90001.1%190++130000.8%200++150000.7%210++200000.5%
Ed SmallTCUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 60 ydsTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct29% of receiving production back price steady
15+-114091.9%25+-300096.8%34+-15861.2%36+-11553.5%38+-11353.1%39+-11453.3%40+-33076.7%41+-13156.7%42+-11252.8%43+-12255%44+-11052.4%45+-11553.5%49+-11152.6%50+-14559.2%54+-11553.5%56+-11052.4%59+-13056.5%60++13043.5%67+-11553.5%70++11047.6%72+-11052.4%80++27027%90++55015.4%100++11008.3%110++20004.8%120++35002.8%130++60001.6%140++90001.1%150++140000.7%160++200000.5%170++140000.7%180++130000.8%190++160000.6%200++200000.5%210++180000.6%
Jordan ShippUNCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 60 ydsUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct33% of receiving production back price steady
15+-470097.9%25+-120092.3%40+-26072.2%50+-14559.2%54+-11553.5%56+-11854.1%58+-11854.1%59+-11553.5%60++11546.5%70+-16061.5%73+-12054.5%80++14540.8%87+-11052.4%90++29025.6%91+-11553.5%100++50016.7%102+-11052.4%110++90010%120++15006.3%130++25003.8%140++40002.4%150++60001.6%160++110000.9%170++160000.6%180++55001.8%190++90001.1%200++130000.8%210++150000.7%220++180000.6%230++200000.5%240++150000.7%250++200000.5%
Jeremy ScottTCUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 24 ydsTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct29% of receiving production back price steady
13+-11553.5%15+-142093.4%24+-12054.5%25++22530.8%31+-11553.5%33+-11553.5%36+-11553.5%38+-11553.5%39+-11252.8%40++60014.3%41+-13156.7%42+-12655.8%43+-10851.9%44+-12755.9%45+-12956.3%46+-12856.1%50++11008.3%60++20004.8%70++30003.2%80++50002%90++90001.1%100++130000.8%110++80001.2%120++120000.8%130++140000.7%140++180000.6%150++120000.8%160++170000.6%
Jon DenmanTCURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 19 ydsTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct31% of rushing production backdrifted -118 → -105
10+-84089.4%15+-38079.2%19++11546.5%20+-90090%22+-11954.3%23+-13056.5%25++45018.2%27+-12355.2%28+-10551.2%29+-10551.2%30++75011.8%35+-12555.6%38+-11553.5%40++17005.6%50++30003.2%60++50002%70++80001.2%80++110000.9%90++150000.7%100++200000.5%110++200000.5%120++180000.6%130++130000.8%140++200000.5%150++200000.5%160++200000.5%
Trech KekahunaUNCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 32 ydsUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct33% of receiving production backdrifted -120 → +100
15+-33577%25+-14058.3%26+-11653.7%28+-11553.5%30+-11854.1%39++17536.4%40+-37078.7%44++10050%50++40020%52+-11052.4%54+-11553.5%60++9509.5%70++22004.3%80++50002%90++110000.9%100++190000.5%110++80001.2%120++150000.7%130++80001.2%140++120000.8%150++200000.5%160++75001.3%170++100001%180++150000.7%190++180000.6%
Demon JuneUNCRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 19 ydsUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct54% of rushing production backdrifted -1080 → +105
10+-29074.4%15+-15560.8%18+-11553.5%20++10548.8%25++15539.2%30++22530.8%33+-10651.5%34+-12856.1%36+-11954.3%37+-13557.4%38+-11753.9%40++42519%41+-11653.7%46+-11854.1%49+-11653.7%50++75011.8%60++12007.7%70++20004.8%80++30003.2%90++50002%100++80001.2%110++120000.8%120++180000.6%
Major EverhartTCUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 24 ydsTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct29% of receiving production back price steady
8+-11553.5%9+-12555.6%14+-11553.5%15+-21568.3%16+-12054.5%21+-11753.9%22+-11453.3%23+-11854.1%24+-10350.7%25++33023.3%26+-11954.3%27+-10751.7%40++90010%50++17005.6%60++30003.2%70++60001.6%80++100001%90++140000.7%100++160000.6%110++150000.7%120++200000.5%130++200000.5%
Mason HumphreyUNCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 20 ydsUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct33% of receiving production back price steady
12++22031.3%13+-12054.5%15+-42981.1%20+-11052.4%25++60014.3%30+-11553.5%31+-11653.7%32+-11653.7%40++25003.8%50++60001.6%60++140000.7%70++35002.8%80++60001.6%90++90001.1%100++150000.7%110++200000.5%120++120000.8%130++160000.6%140++200000.5%150++150000.7%160++180000.6%
Jordan DwyerTCUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 58 ydsTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct29% of receiving production backdrifted -114 → -107
15+-220095.7%25+-65086.7%40+-21468.2%50+-12355.2%53+-10751.7%57+-11453.3%60++12843.9%61+-11453.3%64+-12755.9%66+-11252.8%69+-11453.3%70++19733.7%80++29025.6%90++41819.3%100++59614.4%110++81011%120++11408.1%130++12407.5%140++10408.8%150++12807.2%
Jaden CraigTCURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 6 ydsTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct31% of rushing production back price steady
2+-11052.4%4+-12555.6%5+-12054.5%10++32023.8%11+-11653.7%13+-11954.3%15++47517.4%16+-12054.5%20++70012.5%25++9509.5%30++12007.7%40++22004.3%50++35002.8%60++55001.8%70++80001.2%80++100001%90++170000.6%100++140000.7%110++200000.5%
Billy EdwardsUNCRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 5 ydsUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct54% of rushing production back price steady
2+-12555.6%4+-11553.5%10++17536.4%11+-11052.4%12+-10551.2%13+-12255%15++29525.3%20++45018.2%25++65013.3%30++9509.5%40++18005.3%50++35002.8%60++60001.6%70++100001%80++170000.6%90++150000.7%100++180000.6%
Jeremy PayneTCUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 21 ydsTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct29% of receiving production backdrifted -10000 → -110
14+-11553.5%15+-11553.5%20+-11052.4%25++14041.7%28++14041.7%32+-12555.6%40++36021.7%50++80011.1%60++20004.8%70++40002.4%80++80001.2%90++150000.7%100++75001.3%110++110000.9%120++170000.6%
Benjamin HallUNCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 12 ydsUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct33% of receiving production backdrifted -990 → -115
6+-12054.5%10+-11553.5%25++40020%40++11008.3%50++20004.8%60++35002.8%70++55001.8%80++90001.1%90++140000.7%100++170000.6%110++200000.5%
Terry SheltonTCUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 13 ydsTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct29% of receiving production back price steady
5+-12555.6%12+-11553.5%25++42519%40++12007.7%50++22004.3%60++40002.4%70++75001.3%80++150000.7%90++200000.5%100++150000.7%110++200000.5%
Demon JuneUNCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 17 ydsUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct33% of receiving production back price steady
6+-11553.5%15+-13858%16+-12856.1%25++42519%40++11008.3%50++19005%60++35002.8%70++65001.5%80++110000.9%90++160000.6%
Jelani ThurmanUNCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 30 ydsUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct33% of receiving production back price steady
15+-31676%24+-11653.7%25+-13657.6%26+-12755.9%40++18435.2%50++30025%60++47917.3%70++74011.9%80++10808.5%
Ka'Morreun PimptonTCUReceiving yards
TCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct29% of receiving production backdrifted +150 → +300
41++30025%50++55015.4%60++15006.3%70++35002.8%80++100001%90++200000.5%100++160000.6%
Benjamin HallUNCAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +150 → +1100
Over+11008.3%
Billy EdwardsUNCAnytime TD
5% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +215 → +1900
Over+19005%
C.J. SadlerUNCAnytime TD
1.8% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +950 → +5500
Over+55001.8%
Carnell WarrenUNCAnytime TD
2% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +850 → +5000
Over+50002%
Demon JuneUNCAnytime TD
9.1% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +110 → +1000
Over+10009.1%
Dozie EzukanmaTCUAnytime TD
4.8% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backdrifted +1200 → +2000
Over+20004.8%
Ed SmallTCUAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backdrifted +280 → +500
Over+50016.7%
Jaden CraigTCUAnytime TD
12.5% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backdrifted +170 → +700
Over+70012.5%
Jelani ThurmanUNCAnytime TD
3.2% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +500 → +3000
Over+30003.2%
Jeremy PayneTCUAnytime TD
27% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backdrifted -240 → +270
Over+27027%
Jeremy ScottTCUAnytime TD
11.8% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backdrifted +450 → +750
Over+75011.8%
Jon DenmanTCUAnytime TD
40.8% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backbet up +175 → +145
Over+14540.8%
Jordan DwyerTCUAnytime TD
38.5% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backdrifted +125 → +160
Over+16038.5%
Jordan ShippUNCAnytime TD
6.3% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +155 → +1500
Over+15006.3%
Jordan ShippUNCRushing yards
UNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct54% of rushing production back price steady
1++20004.8%
Ka'Morreun PimptonTCUAnytime TD
6.3% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backdrifted +600 → +1500
Over+15006.3%
Kaleb JacksonUNCAnytime TD
3.4% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +400 → +2800
Over+28003.4%
Lafayette KaiuwayTCUAnytime TD
3.8% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backdrifted +1400 → +2500
Over+25003.8%
Landon WalkerTCUAnytime TD
10% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backdrifted +210 → +900
Over+90010%
Major EverhartTCUAnytime TD
10.5% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backdrifted +600 → +850
Over+85010.5%
Mason HumphreyUNCAnytime TD
3.4% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +400 → +2800
Over+28003.4%
Mason HumphreyUNCRushing yards
UNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct54% of rushing production back price steady
1++45002.2%
Nathan LeacockUNCAnytime TD
2.2% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +1000 → +4500
Over+45002.2%
North Carolina D/STAnytime TD
2.8% to scoredrifted +800 → +3500
Over+35002.8%
Shamar EasterUNCAnytime TD
2% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +1300 → +5000
Over+50002%
TCU D/STAnytime TD
4.3% to scoredrifted +360 → +2200
Over+22004.3%
Terry SheltonTCUAnytime TD
10.5% to scoreTCU implied 17.5 pts · favouredNorth Carolina D was middling — 57th pct22% of overall production backdrifted +450 → +850
Over+85010.5%
Trech KekahunaUNCAnytime TD
3.8% to scoreUNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct28% of overall production backdrifted +425 → +2500
Over+25003.8%
Trech KekahunaUNCRushing yards
UNC implied 16 pts · underdogTCU D was middling — 62th pct54% of rushing production back price steady
1++45018.2%

San Jose State vs USC

Sat 3:01 PM ET51 props

Jayden MaiavaUSCPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 286 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct91% of passing production backdrifted -118 → -105
100+-600098.4%125+-180094.7%150+-70087.5%160+-370097.4%170+-250096.2%175+-33076.7%180+-176094.6%190+-126092.6%200+-15060%209+-12054.5%210+-71087.7%220+-53884.3%225+-90090%230+-41780.7%240+-32476.4%244+-11553.5%250+-26072.2%260+-20367%270+-16362%275+-11553.5%280+-13156.7%284+-11052.4%286+-11453.3%287++70012.5%288+-11954.3%289+-11954.3%290+-10551.2%291+-11854.1%300++20033.3%301+-12054.5%310++14640.7%320++17935.8%325++45018.2%330++22430.9%340++28226.2%350++11008.3%360++43618.7%370++55415.3%375++30003.2%380++69012.7%390++87010.3%400++90001.1%410++12807.2%425++140000.7%
Waymond JordanUSCRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 45 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct78% of rushing production back price steady
15+-1000099%20+-490098%25+-230095.8%30+-120092.3%40+-50083.3%49++45018.2%50+-27673.4%57+-12555.6%59+-11753.9%60+-50083.3%62+-12255%63+-12255%65+-11553.5%66+-11653.7%67+-12054.5%70+-15060%74+-10551.2%76+-10551.2%80++14540.8%90++27526.7%98+-12054.5%100++50016.7%110++85010.5%120++15006.3%130++22004.3%140++35002.8%150++60001.6%160++80001.2%170++120000.8%180++200000.5%190++160000.6%200++80001.2%210++110000.9%220++150000.7%230++190000.5%240++100001%250++140000.7%260++200000.5%
King MillerUSCRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 62 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct78% of rushing production back price steady
15+-1000099%20+-580098.3%25+-240096%30+-2000099.5%40+-140093.3%50+-400097.6%60+-65086.7%64++29025.6%66+-12355.2%67+-12255%68+-11954.3%69+-12255%70+-100090.9%71+-11553.5%72+-12054.5%73+-12054.5%80+-25571.8%81+-11052.4%90+-11052.4%99+-11553.5%100++17037%110++29525.3%120++50016.7%130++80011.1%140++13007.1%150++19005%160++28003.4%170++40002.4%180++55001.8%190++90001.1%200++130000.8%210++190000.5%220++140000.7%230++170000.6%240++190000.5%
Luke WeaverSJSUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 148 ydsUSC D was soft — 13th pct-8% of passing production backbet up +130 → -107
50+-300096.8%75+-140093.3%100+-52584%125+-21067.7%141+-11553.5%143+-11553.5%144+-11553.5%150++11047.6%151+-11753.9%156+-11453.3%160+-13457.3%162+-11854.1%165+-11653.7%166+-11854.1%170+-10751.7%173+-11553.5%175++25528.2%180++11546.5%190++14241.3%200++60014.3%210++21931.3%220++27027%225++16005.9%230+-12054.5%235+-12555.6%240++42119.2%250++40002.4%260++68012.8%270++89010.1%275++130000.8%280++11408.1%290++12007.7%300++180000.6%325++140000.7%
Kayden Dixon-WyattUSCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 32 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct27% of receiving production back price steady
15+-116092.1%25+-13056.5%27+-11052.4%31+-11954.3%32+-12054.5%37++13007.1%38+-12054.5%40++16537.7%42+-11052.4%43+-11753.9%50++36021.7%60++75011.8%70++15006.3%80++28003.4%90++50002%100++90001.1%110++140000.7%120++100001%130++150000.7%140++170000.6%150++190000.5%160++80001.2%170++110000.9%180++150000.7%190++170000.6%200++200000.5%
Trent MosleyUSCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 49 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct27% of receiving production back price steady
15+-320097%25+-50083.3%40+-12555.6%41+-11553.5%45+-10952.2%48+-12154.8%50++15539.2%54+-12255%60++28026.3%70++45018.2%80++75011.8%90++11008.3%91+-12054.5%100++19034.5%110++40020%119++12007.7%120++80011.1%130++16005.9%140++30003.2%150++55001.8%160++80001.2%170++140000.7%180++75001.3%190++100001%200++130000.8%210++200000.5%
Jabari BatesSJSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 31 ydsUSC D was soft — 13th pct36% of rushing production back price steady
10+-180094.7%15+-52584%20+-26572.6%25+-16061.5%26+-10952.2%28+-12555.6%30+-11052.4%38++16038.5%40+-90090%50+-14058.3%51+-12555.6%52+-11052.4%56+-11052.4%60++19034.5%70++39020.4%80++70012.5%90++12007.7%100++22004.3%110++35002.8%120++60001.6%130++90001.1%140++140000.7%150++120000.8%160++170000.6%
Jordan AndersonSJSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 5 ydsUSC D was soft — 13th pct3% of receiving production back price steady
5+-11052.4%8++18035.7%15+-56184.9%17+-11553.5%19+-11052.4%21+-11553.5%25++16537.7%28+-11052.4%35+-11252.8%40++42519%50++75011.8%60++13007.1%70++22004.3%80++35002.8%90++55001.8%100++80001.2%110++120000.8%120++170000.6%130++180000.6%140++110000.9%150++150000.7%
Anthony IveySJSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 20 ydsUSC D was soft — 13th pct3% of receiving production back price steady
9+-11553.5%11+-11553.5%14+-11052.4%15+-12054.5%20+-11052.4%25++32023.8%30+-11753.9%34+-11753.9%35++35022.2%40++90010%50++17005.6%60++28003.4%70++45002.2%80++75001.3%90++140000.7%100++200000.5%110++100001%120++140000.7%130++160000.6%140++200000.5%
Mark BowmanUSCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 15 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct27% of receiving production backdrifted -129 → -113
13+-12054.5%15+-176094.6%16++20004.8%22+-11553.5%25++23529.9%27+-11553.5%40++70012.5%41+-11353.1%44+-11854.1%47+-12555.6%50++14006.7%60++25003.8%70++45002.2%80++80001.2%90++140000.7%100++180000.6%110++200000.5%120++140000.7%130++200000.5%140++170000.6%
Zacharyus WilliamsUSCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 24 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct27% of receiving production backdrifted -238 → +105
15+-38979.6%22+-12555.6%25++10548.8%27+-11553.5%29+-10751.7%30+-11453.3%32++11008.3%33+-12054.5%34+-11553.5%36+-11453.3%40++15539.2%50++36021.7%60++75011.8%70++15006.3%80++30003.2%90++55001.8%100++80001.2%110++180000.6%120++190000.5%130++200000.5%
Jayden MaiavaUSCRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 9 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct78% of rushing production backdrifted -243 → +120
7+-12555.6%10++12045.5%11+-12054.5%14+-12154.8%15++18035.7%16+-12355.2%20++26527.4%25++37021.3%30++50016.7%40++9509.5%50++16005.9%60++30003.2%70++45002.2%80++75001.3%90++120000.8%100++170000.6%110++160000.6%120++190000.5%
Corey SimmsUSCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 18 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct27% of receiving production back price steady
14++10050%15+-12555.6%20++11047.6%25++33023.3%40++55015.4%43++16005.9%50++13007.1%60++28003.4%70++50002%80++100001%90++170000.6%100++80001.2%110++120000.8%120++160000.6%130++190000.5%140++160000.6%150++190000.5%
Jerry McClureSJSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 23 ydsUSC D was soft — 13th pct3% of receiving production back price steady
13+-12054.5%14+-11052.4%18+-11052.4%22+-12555.6%25++23529.9%40++70012.5%46++13542.6%50++13007.1%56++30025%60++22004.3%70++45002.2%80++80001.2%90++120000.8%100++180000.6%110++150000.7%120++140000.7%130++180000.6%
Tanook HinesUSCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 80 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct27% of receiving production backdrifted -122 → +101
25+-430097.7%40+-77088.5%50+-38979.6%60+-22669.3%70+-14759.5%78+-10751.7%80++10149.8%81+-11954.3%90++14441%100++20033.3%110++27426.7%120++37621%130++50316.6%140++67013%150++90010%160++12007.7%170++12807.2%
Isaiah CarlsonSJSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 13 ydsUSC D was soft — 13th pct36% of rushing production back price steady
1++14540.8%10+-14058.3%11+-12054.5%15++12544.4%20++19034.5%25++28026.3%30++39020.4%40++70012.5%50++12007.7%60++20004.8%70++35002.8%80++50002%90++80001.2%100++110000.9%110++160000.6%
Terrell AndersonUSCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 59 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct27% of receiving production back price steady
15+-400097.6%25+-93090.3%40+-27973.6%50+-15861.2%56+-11753.9%60++10349.3%70++15439.4%80++22730.6%90++32023.8%100++45318.1%110++63013.7%120++86010.4%130++11607.9%
King MillerUSCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 13 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct27% of receiving production back price steady
1++45002.2%8+-11553.5%11+-12054.5%25++34022.7%40++9509.5%50++17005.6%60++30003.2%70++50002%80++75001.3%90++110000.9%100++180000.6%110++190000.5%
Waymond JordanUSCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 9 ydsSan José State D was middling — 44th pct27% of receiving production back price steady
1++65001.5%7+-11553.5%25++37021.3%40++11008.3%50++20004.8%60++40002.4%70++60001.6%80++100001%90++150000.7%
Jabari BatesSJSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 13 ydsUSC D was soft — 13th pct3% of receiving production back price steady
10++42519%11+-11553.5%25++27526.7%40++85010.5%50++19005%60++35002.8%70++60001.6%80++110000.9%
Anthony IveySJSUAnytime TD
1.5% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +1200 → +6500
Over+65001.5%
Cooper HochSJSUAnytime TD
1.6% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +750 → +6000
Over+60001.6%
Corey SimmsUSCAnytime TD
2% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted +400 → +5000
Over+50002%
Dominique McKenzieSJSUAnytime TD
1.1% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +1100 → +9000
Over+90001.1%
Ethan FeasterUSCAnytime TD
1.6% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted +275 → +6000
Over+60001.6%
Isaiah CarlsonSJSUAnytime TD
1.2% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +390 → +8000
Over+80001.2%
Jabari BatesSJSUAnytime TD
2.2% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +155 → +4500
Over+45002.2%
Jackson CanaanSJSUAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backbet up +1400 → +1100
Over+11008.3%
Jase NixSJSUAnytime TD
0.9% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +1100 → +11000
Over+110000.9%
Jayden MaiavaUSCAnytime TD
46.5% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted -155 → +115
Over+11546.5%
Jerry McClureSJSUAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +550 → +1100
Over+11008.3%
Jerry McClureSJSURushing yards
USC D was soft — 13th pct36% of rushing production backdrifted +2500 → +14000
1++140000.7%
Jordan AndersonSJSUAnytime TD
4.8% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +1200 → +2000
Over+20004.8%
Kamaehu Kopa-KaawalauoleSJSUAnytime TD
1.3% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +650 → +7500
Over+75001.3%
Kayden Dixon-WyattUSCAnytime TD
38.5% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted +125 → +160
Over+16038.5%
King MillerUSCAnytime TD
57.4% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted -340 → -135
Over-13557.4%
Luke WeaverSJSUAnytime TD
1.2% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +380 → +8000
Over+80001.2%
Malachi RileySJSUAnytime TD
29% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backbet up +310 → +245
Over+24529%
Mark BowmanUSCAnytime TD
1.6% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted -105 → +6000
Over+60001.6%
Riley WormleyUSCAnytime TD
26.3% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted +155 → +280
Over+28026.3%
Ryan BoultwoodSJSUAnytime TD
0.8% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +2200 → +12000
Over+120000.8%
San Jose State D/STAnytime TD
0.9% to scoredrifted +850 → +11000
Over+110000.9%
Tanook HinesUSCAnytime TD
51.2% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted -175 → -105
Over-10551.2%
Terrell AndersonUSCAnytime TD
59.2% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backbet up -120 → -145
Over-14559.2%
Trent MosleyUSCAnytime TD
29.4% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted -125 → +240
Over+24029.4%
Tucker AshcraftUSCAnytime TD
0.5% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted +475 → +20000
Over+200000.5%
Tyler JacklichSJSUAnytime TD
12.5% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +600 → +700
Over+70012.5%
USC D/STAnytime TD
2.4% to scoredrifted +425 → +4000
Over+40002.4%
Viliami TeuSJSUAnytime TD
0.5% to scoreUSC D was soft — 13th pct4% of overall production backdrifted +350 → +19000
Over+190000.5%
Waymond JordanUSCAnytime TD
30.8% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted -370 → +225
Over+22530.8%
Zacharyus WilliamsUSCAnytime TD
1.3% to scoreSan José State D was middling — 44th pct59% of overall production backdrifted +170 → +7500
Over+75001.3%

NC State vs Virginia

Sat 3:30 PM ETtotal 42.546 props

CJ BaileyNCSTPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 120 ydsNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct93% of passing production back price steady
Over-11353.1%Over-11553.5%Over-11553.5%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%50+-90090%75+-33076.7%100+-14559.2%107+-11553.5%119+-11553.5%125++15539.2%150++34022.7%160+-63086.3%170+-48783%172+-11553.5%175++80011.1%180+-37879.1%190+-29674.7%200++22004.3%210+-12054.5%220+-15060%225++65001.5%230+-12054.5%231+-11753.9%240++10548.8%250++170000.6%260++16138.3%270++20133.2%275++170000.6%280++25128.5%290++31124.3%300++30003.2%310++49016.9%320++62013.9%325++70001.4%330++79011.2%340++10009.1%350++170000.6%375++75001.3%400++140000.7%
Beau PribulaUVAPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 75 ydsUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct1% of passing production backdrifted -1600 → +100
Over-11453.3%Over-11353.1%Over-11353.1%Over-11353.1%Over-11553.5%50+-400097.6%71+-11553.5%75++10050%100++21032.3%115+-11553.5%125++45018.2%150++10009.1%160+-45481.9%170+-35578%171+-12054.5%175++25003.8%180+-27773.5%190+-22068.8%200++60001.6%208+-11553.5%210+-14258.7%219+-11753.9%220+-11553.5%225++160000.6%230++10848.1%240++13442.7%250++40002.4%260++20732.6%270++25528.2%275++90001.1%280++31923.9%290++40020%300++200000.5%310++62013.9%320++79011.2%325++50002%330++10009.1%340++12807.2%350++120000.8%
Beau PribulaUVARushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 53 ydsUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct21% of rushing production back price steady
10+-124092.5%15+-53384.2%20+-29174.4%25+-18264.5%30+-12455.4%31+-11753.9%33+-11954.3%40+-35077.8%50+-11553.5%51+-11553.5%60++18035.7%70++32023.8%80+-24571%86+-13056.5%90+-24070.6%97+-10551.2%100++12544.4%110++27027%120++50016.7%130++9509.5%140++16005.9%150++25003.8%160++40002.4%170++60001.6%180++100001%190++140000.7%200++200000.5%
Duke ScottNCSTRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 38 ydsNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct101% of rushing production back price steady
20+-600098.4%25+-350097.2%30+-29574.7%37+-11553.5%40++12045.5%44+-11052.4%50++27526.7%51+-12054.5%60++50016.7%62+-12054.5%69+-11954.3%70++10009.1%80++18005.3%90++30003.2%100++45002.2%110++70001.4%120++110000.9%130++140000.7%140++130000.8%150++190000.5%160++100001%170++150000.7%180++190000.5%190++100001%200++130000.8%210++190000.5%
Jekail MiddlebrookUVARushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 69 ydsUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct21% of rushing production back price steady
15+-1000099%20+-510098.1%25+-600098.4%30+-180094.7%40+-50083.3%50+-22068.8%60+-12054.5%62+-11553.5%68+-12154.8%69+-12255%70++14041.7%80++21531.7%90++33023.3%100++50016.7%110++75011.8%120++10009.1%130++16005.9%140++20004.8%150++30003.2%160++40002.4%170++50002%180++70001.4%190++100001%200++100001%210++150000.7%220++200000.5%
Jojo TraderNCSTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 39 ydsNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct26% of receiving production back price steady
15+-138093.2%25+-32076.2%35+-12054.5%39+-11553.5%40++12045.5%41+-11553.5%42+-12054.5%45+-12054.5%50++24029.4%60++42519%70++75011.8%80++13007.1%90++20004.8%100++30003.2%110++45002.2%120++75001.3%130++100001%140++140000.7%150++170000.6%160++200000.5%170++200000.5%180++170000.6%190++140000.7%200++200000.5%
Jacquon GibsonUVAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 19 ydsUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct9% of receiving production back price steady
6+-11553.5%10+-10551.2%15+-90090%18+-11052.4%25++42519%32+-11553.5%40++12007.7%50++22004.3%60++35002.8%70++65001.5%80++110000.9%90++190000.5%100++200000.5%110++110000.9%120++160000.6%130++190000.5%140++65001.5%150++80001.2%160++130000.8%170++170000.6%180++200000.5%
Victor SnowNCSTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 21 ydsNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct26% of receiving production back price steady
15+-83089.2%16+-11052.4%21+-10551.2%25++18535.1%29+-12054.5%38+-12054.5%40++50016.7%50++90010%60++17005.6%70++28003.4%80++45002.2%90++70001.4%100++110000.9%110++170000.6%120++200000.5%130++190000.5%140++130000.8%150++190000.5%160++100001%170++130000.8%180++160000.6%
CJ BaileyNCSTRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 13 ydsNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct101% of rushing production back price steady
10++12544.4%11+-12054.5%13+-12154.8%15++19533.9%20++29525.3%25++40020%30++55015.4%32+-11553.5%33+-12054.5%40++25528.2%50++55015.4%60++11008.3%70++20004.8%80++30003.2%90++55001.8%100++90001.1%110++120000.8%120++150000.7%130++200000.5%
Davion DozierNCSTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 23 ydsNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct26% of receiving production back price steady
9+-13056.5%13+-11553.5%15+-41780.7%21+-11553.5%23+-11553.5%25++30025%31+-11553.5%40++85010.5%50++16005.9%60++28003.4%70++50002%80++70001.4%90++100001%100++150000.7%110++180000.6%120++140000.7%130++200000.5%140++150000.7%150++190000.5%
Keenan JacksonNCSTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 18 ydsNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct26% of receiving production back price steady
13+-12054.5%15+-39379.7%17+-11553.5%25++22530.8%30+-12054.5%40++65013.3%50++12007.7%60++20004.8%70++35002.8%80++55001.8%90++90001.1%100++140000.7%110++200000.5%120++190000.5%130++120000.8%140++150000.7%150++200000.5%160++190000.5%
Peyton LewisUVARushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 12 ydsUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct21% of rushing production back price steady
10+-13557.4%11+-11553.5%15++14540.8%18+-12054.5%20++24029.4%25++35022.2%30++50016.7%36+-11854.1%40++10009.1%50++19005%60++35002.8%70++55001.8%80++90001.1%90++120000.8%100++170000.6%110++200000.5%120++150000.7%130++180000.6%
TyLyric ColemanUVAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 23 ydsUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct9% of receiving production back price steady
7+-11052.4%14+-11553.5%15+-62086.1%23+-12054.5%25++38020.8%36+-11453.3%40++11008.3%50++20004.8%60++35002.8%70++60001.6%80++100001%90++130000.8%100++170000.6%110++130000.8%120++170000.6%130++100001%140++140000.7%150++200000.5%
Kameron CourtneyUVAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 23 ydsUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct9% of receiving production back price steady
6+-12054.5%14+-11052.4%15+-44781.7%23+-12054.5%25++40020%32+-11553.5%40++11008.3%50++20004.8%60++40002.4%70++65001.5%80++110000.9%90++190000.5%100++110000.9%110++150000.7%120++200000.5%130++120000.8%140++160000.6%
Jayden Scott (NC State)Rushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 74 yds price steady
25+-230095.8%30+-130092.9%40+-53784.3%50+-29274.5%60+-17864%66+-11854.1%69+-12154.8%70+-11753.9%80++12644.2%90++17935.8%100++24928.7%110++34522.5%120++46317.8%130++62013.9%140++82010.9%150++10608.6%
Joshisa Trader (NC State)Receiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 49 ydsbet up +156 → +107
15+-144093.5%25+-46382.2%39+-11353.1%40+-15861.2%43+-12154.8%45+-12054.5%50++10748.3%60++17136.9%70++25827.9%80++38120.8%90++55215.3%100++78011.4%110++10808.5%
Dakota TwittyUVAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 22 ydsUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct9% of receiving production back price steady
14+-12054.5%15+-19265.8%21+-11753.9%25++19034.5%40++47517.4%50++85010.5%60++15006.3%70++25003.8%80++40002.4%90++70001.4%100++120000.8%110++150000.7%
Jekail MiddlebrookUVAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 17 ydsUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct9% of receiving production back price steady
7+-12054.5%16+-12054.5%25++36021.7%40++10009.1%50++19005%60++35002.8%70++60001.6%80++100001%90++200000.5%100++80001.2%110++120000.8%120++200000.5%
Duke ScottNCSTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 13 ydsNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct26% of receiving production back price steady
9+-11553.5%11+-12054.5%25++30025%40++85010.5%50++16005.9%60++28003.4%70++50002%80++80001.2%90++130000.8%100++180000.6%110++190000.5%
Rico Flores Jr.UVAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 39 ydsUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct9% of receiving production back price steady
15+-65086.7%25+-25371.7%37+-11152.6%40++10748.3%50++17736.1%60++27726.5%70++43318.8%80++64013.5%90++9509.5%100++13207%
Beau PribulaUVAAnytime TD
1.6% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production backdrifted -145 → +6000
Over+60001.6%
Chance RobinsonNCSTAnytime TD
1% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted +650 → +10000
Over+100001%
CJ BaileyNCSTAnytime TD
1.6% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted +100 → +6000
Over+60001.6%
Dakota TwittyUVAAnytime TD
0.4% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +400 → +25000
Over+250000.4%
DaShawn MartinUVAAnytime TD
10.5% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +500 → +850
Over+85010.5%
Davion DozierNCSTAnytime TD
1.2% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted +550 → +8000
Over+80001.2%
Davion GauseNCSTAnytime TD
1.8% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted +180 → +5500
Over+55001.8%
Deandre DesinorNCSTAnytime TD
0.7% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted +700 → +14000
Over+140000.7%
Duke ScottNCSTAnytime TD
2.2% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted -185 → +4500
Over+45002.2%
Dylan CopeUVAAnytime TD
3.4% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +950 → +2800
Over+28003.4%
Jacquon GibsonUVAAnytime TD
0.5% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +425 → +20000
Over+200000.5%
Je'Rel BolderNCSTAnytime TD
0.8% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted +1100 → +12000
Over+120000.8%
Jekail MiddlebrookUVAAnytime TD
2% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production backdrifted -225 → +5000
Over+50002%
John RogersUVAAnytime TD
0.2% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +950 → +40000
Over+400000.2%
Jojo TraderNCSTAnytime TD
2% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted +260 → +5000
Over+50002%
Kameron CourtneyUVAAnytime TD
0.5% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +310 → +20000
Over+200000.5%
Keenan JacksonNCSTAnytime TD
1.5% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted +360 → +6500
Over+65001.5%
NC State D/STAnytime TD
0.9% to scoredrifted +600 → +11000
Over+110000.9%
Peyton LewisUVAAnytime TD
1.2% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +240 → +8000
Over+80001.2%
Preston DouglasNCSTAnytime TD
0.9% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted +600 → +11000
Over+110000.9%
Rico Flores Jr.UVAAnytime TD
32.3% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+21032.3%
TyLyric ColemanUVAAnytime TD
0.3% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +500 → +30000
Over+300000.3%
Vander PloogNCSTAnytime TD
0.8% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted +800 → +12000
Over+120000.8%
Victor SnowNCSTAnytime TD
1.6% to scoreNCST implied 8 pts · underdogVirginia D was tough — 86th pct60% of overall production backdrifted +240 → +6000
Over+60001.6%
Virginia D/STAnytime TD
1.1% to scoredrifted +500 → +9000
Over+90001.1%
Xay DavisUVAAnytime TD
10.5% to scoreUVA implied 34.5 pts · favouredNC State D was tough — 72th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +135 → +850
Over+85010.5%

Jacksonville State vs North Dakota State

Sat 5:30 PM ETtotal 43.532 props

Caden CreelJSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 88 ydsJSU implied 9 pts · underdogdrifted -117 → -101
20+-1000099%25+-530098.1%30+-250096.2%40+-91090.1%50+-46982.4%60+-27773.5%70+-17864%80+-12054.5%85+-10150.2%86+-11753.9%90++11646.3%100++16038.5%110++21631.6%120++29125.6%130++37820.9%140++50016.7%150++65013.3%160++84010.6%170++11008.3%180++11807.8%
Nathan HayesNDSUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 198 ydsNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pct price steady
150+-29074.4%160+-23269.9%170+-18564.9%180+-14959.8%190+-12054.5%191+-11753.9%200++10449%210++12943.7%220++15838.8%230++19434%240++23829.6%250++29625.3%260++36621.5%270++45418.1%280++57014.9%290++73012%300++9309.7%310++11807.8%
DJ ScottNDSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 64 ydsNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pct price steady
10+-1000099%15+-760098.7%20+-260096.3%25+-128092.8%30+-73088%40+-33977.2%50+-18865.3%56+-11353.1%60+-11653.7%61+-11152.6%70++13143.3%80++18834.7%90++27127%100++37820.9%110++53315.8%120++73012%130++9909.2%
Deondre JohnsonJSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 65 ydsJSU implied 9 pts · underdog price steady
15+-690098.6%25+-124092.5%40+-33777.1%50+-18765.2%53+-11854.1%57+-11653.7%60+-11653.7%63+-11353.1%70++13043.5%80++19334.1%90++28226.2%100++39120.4%110++54015.6%120++75011.8%130++10408.8%140++12007.7%
Jalen LikelyJSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 59 ydsJSU implied 9 pts · underdog price steady
10+-1000099%15+-480098%20+-188094.9%25+-97090.7%30+-58585.4%40+-27273.1%50+-15460.6%56+-11353.1%60++10548.8%70++16038.5%80++24029.4%90++34822.3%100++49316.9%110++69012.7%120++9509.5%130++12607.4%
Caden CreelJSUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 148 ydsJSU implied 9 pts · underdogbet up +526 → +106
140+-11753.9%141+-11453.3%143+-11553.5%150++10648.5%160++13143.3%170++16537.7%180++20632.7%190++25328.3%200++31424.2%210++39520.2%220++49616.8%230++62013.9%240++77011.5%250++10009.1%260++12607.4%
Nathan HayesNDSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 42 ydsNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pct price steady
10+-290096.7%15+-104091.2%20+-53084.1%25+-32276.3%30+-21668.4%39+-11954.3%40+-11252.8%50++15339.5%60++24329.2%70++37321.1%80++55815.2%90++83010.8%100++12207.6%
Caden CreelJSUAnytime TD
54.5% to scoreJSU implied 9 pts · underdogbet up -110 → -120
Over-12054.5%
Cedric KouemiJSUAnytime TD
2.4% to scoreJSU implied 9 pts · underdogdrifted +175 → +4000
Over+40002.4%
Chris KielNDSUAnytime TD
1.5% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctdrifted +800 → +6500
Over+65001.5%
Darius CannonJSUAnytime TD
2.2% to scoreJSU implied 9 pts · underdogdrifted +450 → +4500
Over+45002.2%
David AlpersJSUAnytime TD
1.2% to scoreJSU implied 9 pts · underdogdrifted +700 → +8000
Over+80001.2%
Deondre JohnsonJSUAnytime TD
3.2% to scoreJSU implied 9 pts · underdogdrifted +190 → +3000
Over+30003.2%
DJ ScottNDSUAnytime TD
19% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctdrifted -200 → +425
Over+42519%
Dylan GentryJSUAnytime TD
0.9% to scoreJSU implied 9 pts · underdogdrifted +1000 → +11000
Over+110000.9%
Isiah St. RomainNDSUAnytime TD
2.8% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctdrifted +450 → +3500
Over+35002.8%
Jackson WilliamsNDSUAnytime TD
3.8% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctdrifted +265 → +2500
Over+25003.8%
Jacksonville State D/STAnytime TD
1% to scoredrifted +550 → +10000
Over+100001%
Jalen LikelyJSUAnytime TD
3.8% to scoreJSU implied 9 pts · underdogdrifted -115 → +2500
Over+25003.8%
Jamil WilliamsJSUAnytime TD
1.1% to scoreJSU implied 9 pts · underdogdrifted +1000 → +9000
Over+90001.1%
Kaden ZenzenNDSUAnytime TD
2.2% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctdrifted +450 → +4500
Over+45002.2%
Khristian LandoJSUAnytime TD
1% to scoreJSU implied 9 pts · underdogdrifted +700 → +10000
Over+100001%
Logan ConklinNDSUAnytime TD
1.8% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctdrifted +650 → +5500
Over+55001.8%
Luke GilbertJSUAnytime TD
1.1% to scoreJSU implied 9 pts · underdogdrifted +900 → +9000
Over+90001.1%
Luke KokatNDSUAnytime TD
4.8% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctdrifted +380 → +2000
Over+20004.8%
Mekhi CollinsNDSUAnytime TD
3.8% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctdrifted +230 → +2500
Over+25003.8%
Myles MitchellNDSUAnytime TD
12.5% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctdrifted +120 → +700
Over+70012.5%
Nathan HayesNDSUAnytime TD
15.4% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctdrifted +115 → +550
Over+55015.4%
North Dakota State D/STAnytime TD
7.7% to scoredrifted +475 → +1200
Over+12007.7%
Nyeoti PunniNDSUAnytime TD
7.7% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctdrifted +205 → +1200
Over+12007.7%
Reis KesselNDSUAnytime TD
23.8% to scoreNDSU implied 34.5 pts · favouredJacksonville State D was middling — 47th pctbet up +425 → +320
Over+32023.8%
Ronnel JohnsonJSUAnytime TD
1.8% to scoreJSU implied 9 pts · underdogdrifted +450 → +5500
Over+55001.8%

Sacramento State vs Eastern Michigan

Sat 6:30 PM ETtotal 51.527 props

Noah KimEMUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 255 ydsEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured97% of passing production backbet up +114 → -110
150+-142093.4%160+-102091.1%170+-75088.2%180+-57185.1%190+-44181.5%200+-34177.3%210+-26672.7%220+-21368.1%230+-16862.7%236+-11954.3%240+-13557.4%244+-11653.7%248+-11453.3%249+-11753.9%250+-11052.4%260++11247.2%270++13941.8%280++17236.8%290++21331.9%300++26327.5%310++33023.3%320++41519.4%330++52216.1%340++65013.3%350++83010.8%360++10408.8%370++12607.4%
Carson ConklinSACPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 196 ydsSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pct price steady
150+-26672.7%160+-21067.7%170+-16862.7%180+-13457.3%186+-11854.1%190+-10952.2%192+-11753.9%200++11346.9%210++14141.5%220++17536.4%230++21731.5%240++26927.1%250++33323.1%260++41419.5%270++51616.2%280++64013.5%290++80011.1%300++10009.1%310++12607.4%
Jamar CurtisSACRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 74 ydsSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pct price steady
15+-1000099%20+-430097.7%25+-230095.8%30+-124092.5%40+-54484.5%50+-29074.4%60+-17663.8%61+-11553.5%66+-12455.4%69+-12054.5%70+-11553.5%80++12644.2%90++17935.8%100++24828.7%110++34222.6%120++46417.7%130++62013.9%140++84010.6%150++11208.2%
Amareon BlueEMUAnytime TD
15.4% to scoreEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured72% of overall production backdrifted -160 → +550
Over+55015.4%
Benson ProsperEMUAnytime TD
4.8% to scoreEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured72% of overall production backdrifted +260 → +2000
Over+20004.8%
Braydon BennettEMUAnytime TD
31.7% to scoreEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured72% of overall production backdrifted -135 → +215
Over+21531.7%
Carson ConklinSACAnytime TD
4.8% to scoreSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pctdrifted +155 → +2000
Over+20004.8%
Cedric AntonSACAnytime TD
1.8% to scoreSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pctdrifted +1100 → +5500
Over+55001.8%
Dalin WilkinsEMUAnytime TD
2.8% to scoreEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured72% of overall production backdrifted +500 → +3500
Over+35002.8%
Davion GodleySACAnytime TD
4.3% to scoreSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pctdrifted +215 → +2200
Over+22004.3%
Eastern Michigan D/STAnytime TD
4.3% to scoredrifted +500 → +2200
Over+22004.3%
Elias BrownSACAnytime TD
5% to scoreSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pctdrifted -105 → +1900
Over+19005%
Harold MackEMUAnytime TD
5.6% to scoreEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured72% of overall production backdrifted +205 → +1700
Over+17005.6%
Jace WilsonSACAnytime TD
2.8% to scoreSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pctdrifted +650 → +3500
Over+35002.8%
Jamar CurtisSACAnytime TD
7.7% to scoreSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pctdrifted -160 → +1200
Over+12007.7%
Joey MattordEMUAnytime TD
12.5% to scoreEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured72% of overall production backdrifted -140 → +700
Over+70012.5%
Jordan WilliamsSACAnytime TD
3.8% to scoreSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pctdrifted +475 → +2500
Over+25003.8%
Joshua LongEMUAnytime TD
5.6% to scoreEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured72% of overall production backdrifted +205 → +1700
Over+17005.6%
Khai TaylorSACAnytime TD
2.4% to scoreSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pctdrifted +850 → +4000
Over+40002.4%
Kozy IsaacEMUAnytime TD
7.7% to scoreEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured72% of overall production backdrifted +750 → +1200
Over+12007.7%
Matt ColemanSACAnytime TD
5% to scoreSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pctdrifted +190 → +1900
Over+19005%
Nick DevereauxEMUAnytime TD
15.4% to scoreEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured72% of overall production backdrifted -110 → +550
Over+55015.4%
Noah KimEMUAnytime TD
46.5% to scoreEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured72% of overall production backdrifted -125 → +115
Over+11546.5%
Onterrio SmithSACAnytime TD
4.3% to scoreSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pctdrifted +270 → +2200
Over+22004.3%
Raiden BrownSACAnytime TD
4.3% to scoreSAC implied 19 pts · underdogEastern Michigan D was soft — 29th pctdrifted +450 → +2200
Over+22004.3%
Sacramento State D/STAnytime TD
9.1% to scoredrifted +650 → +1000
Over+10009.1%
Tanner LemasterEMUAnytime TD
2.2% to scoreEMU implied 32.5 pts · favoured72% of overall production backdrifted +800 → +4500
Over+45002.2%

Hawaii vs Stanford

Sat 7:00 PM ETtotal 56.537 props

Micah AlejadoHAWPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 278 ydsHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct91% of passing production back price steady
Over-11353.1%Over-11453.3%Over-11553.5%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%Over-11353.1%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%150+-310096.9%160+-210095.5%170+-148093.7%180+-108091.5%190+-80088.9%200+-61085.9%210+-46582.3%220+-36678.5%230+-28674.1%240+-22969.6%250+-18364.7%259+-11653.7%260+-14759.5%264+-11653.7%270+-11854.1%274+-10451%275+-10551.2%280++10548.8%290++13143.3%300++16437.9%310++20333%320++25228.4%330++30824.5%340++38420.7%350++48117.2%360++61014.1%370++78011.4%380++9909.2%390++12607.4%
Davis WarrenSTANPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 200 ydsSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct-1% of passing production back price steady
Over-11353.1%Over-11353.1%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%Over-11453.3%Over-11353.1%Over-11353.1%Over-11453.3%Over-11553.5%150+-30175.1%160+-23970.5%170+-19165.6%180+-15460.6%190+-12455.4%192+-11854.1%193+-11653.7%196+-11453.3%200++10050%210++12444.6%220++15339.5%230++18934.6%240++23529.9%250++29425.4%260++36821.4%270++46217.8%280++57914.7%290++73012%300++9309.7%310++11807.8%
Micah FordSTANRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 97 ydsSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct135% of rushing production back price steady
20+-1000099%25+-1000099%30+-430097.7%40+-146093.6%50+-69087.3%60+-39479.8%70+-24971.3%80+-16562.3%90+-11753.9%91+-11353.1%95+-11553.5%100++11746.1%110++15738.9%120++20832.5%130++27226.9%140++35522%150++45118.1%160++57414.8%170++74011.9%180++9309.7%190++11607.9%200++12207.6%
Tama UiliataHAWReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 48 ydsHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct52% of receiving production backbet up +186 → +110
15+-136093.2%25+-44681.7%36+-11252.8%40+-15560.8%42+-12355.2%46+-11152.6%50++11047.6%60++17236.8%70++26027.8%80++38520.6%90++55115.4%100++77011.5%110++11008.3%
Audric HarrisHAWReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 47 ydsHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct52% of receiving production backdrifted -121 → -111
15+-124092.5%25+-41280.5%40+-14659.3%42+-11453.3%45+-11152.6%50++11546.5%60++18335.3%70++27926.4%80++41119.6%90++59114.5%100++82010.9%110++11807.8%
Cam BarfieldHAWRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 36 ydsHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct21% of rushing production backdrifted -119 → -104
10+-148093.7%15+-61085.9%20+-33577%25+-21368.1%30+-14559.2%35+-10451%40++13043.5%50++22630.7%60++37521.1%70++57814.7%80++87010.3%90++12807.2%
Devin AlvesHAWReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 44 ydsHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct52% of receiving production back price steady
15+-96090.6%25+-33777.1%38+-11353.1%40+-12455.4%42+-11252.8%50++13542.6%60++21232.1%70++32123.8%80++46917.6%90++69012.7%100++9609.4%
DeVon RiceHAWRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 21 ydsHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct21% of rushing production back price steady
10+-60085.7%15+-29474.6%20+-17363.4%21++10050%24+-12255%25+-11353.1%30++12644.2%40++23330%50++39820.1%60++66013.2%70++10208.9%
Carter ShawSTANReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 33 ydsSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct31% of receiving production back price steady
15+-36078.3%25+-15560.8%29+-11753.9%31+-11753.9%40++16338%50++27027%60++42719%70++65013.3%80++9809.3%90++12607.4%
JonAnthony HallSTANReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 40 ydsSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct31% of receiving production back price steady
15+-73088%25+-26872.8%38+-11252.8%40++10149.8%50++16737.5%60++26127.7%70++39920%80++60014.3%90++89010.1%100++12607.4%
Benji BlackburnSTANReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 29 ydsSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct31% of receiving production back price steady
15+-28474%21+-11453.3%25+-12655.8%26+-11753.9%40++20033.3%50++33722.9%60++53415.8%70++82010.9%80++12407.5%
Blaze KamokuHAWReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 29 ydsHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct52% of receiving production back price steady
15+-28373.9%25+-12655.8%26+-11753.9%40++20133.2%50++33423%60++53015.9%70++82010.9%80++12207.6%
Micah FordSTANReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 19 ydsSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct31% of receiving production backbet up -116 → -127
15+-13858%16+-12755.9%25++15738.9%40++40020%50++67013%60++11208.2%
Audric HarrisHAWAnytime TD
5% to scoreHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct65% of overall production backdrifted +155 → +1900
Over+19005%
Benji BlackburnSTANAnytime TD
7.7% to scoreSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +380 → +1200
Over+12007.7%
Blaze KamokuHAWAnytime TD
2% to scoreHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct65% of overall production backdrifted +650 → +5000
Over+50002%
Caden HighSTANAnytime TD
11.1% to scoreSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +275 → +800
Over+80011.1%
Cam BarfieldHAWAnytime TD
3.8% to scoreHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct65% of overall production backdrifted +190 → +2500
Over+25003.8%
Carson BrownHAWAnytime TD
4.3% to scoreHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct65% of overall production backdrifted +215 → +2200
Over+22004.3%
Carter ShawSTANAnytime TD
11.1% to scoreSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +250 → +800
Over+80011.1%
Davis WarrenSTANAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +120 → +500
Over+50016.7%
Devin AlvesHAWAnytime TD
3.2% to scoreHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct65% of overall production backdrifted +300 → +3000
Over+30003.2%
DeVon RiceHAWAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct65% of overall production backdrifted +400 → +500
Over+50016.7%
DeVon RiceHAWReceiving yards
HAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct52% of receiving production back price steady
1+-11553.5%
Devon TauaefaHAWAnytime TD
2% to scoreHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct65% of overall production backdrifted +650 → +5000
Over+50002%
Diezel KamokuHAWAnytime TD
2.2% to scoreHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct65% of overall production backdrifted +600 → +4500
Over+45002.2%
Hawaii D/STAnytime TD
1.4% to scoredrifted +500 → +7000
Over+70001.4%
JonAnthony HallSTANAnytime TD
10.5% to scoreSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +280 → +850
Over+85010.5%
Jordan OnovugheSTANAnytime TD
5.3% to scoreSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +700 → +1800
Over+18005.3%
Micah AlejadoHAWAnytime TD
4.8% to scoreHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct65% of overall production backdrifted +135 → +2000
Over+20004.8%
Micah FordSTANAnytime TD
63.6% to scoreSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct21% of overall production backdrifted -200 → -175
Over-17563.6%
Nico BrownSTANAnytime TD
11.1% to scoreSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +240 → +800
Over+80011.1%
Sedrick IrvinSTANAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +155 → +600
Over+60014.3%
Stanford D/STAnytime TD
2.2% to scoredrifted +500 → +4500
Over+45002.2%
Tama UiliataHAWAnytime TD
11.8% to scoreHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct65% of overall production backdrifted +175 → +750
Over+75011.8%
Tre' GriffithsHAWAnytime TD
4.3% to scoreHAW implied 27 pts · underdogStanford D was middling — 42th pct65% of overall production backdrifted +215 → +2200
Over+22004.3%
Tuna AltahirSTANAnytime TD
9.5% to scoreSTAN implied 29.5 pts · favouredHawai'i D was middling — 49th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +240 → +950
Over+9509.5%

New Mexico State vs Florida State

Sat 7:00 PM ETtotal 51.551 props

Ashton DanielsFSUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 239 ydsFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct13% of passing production back price steady
150+-78088.6%160+-61085.9%170+-47282.5%180+-36378.4%190+-28674.1%193+-12054.5%200+-22569.2%209+-12555.6%210+-18264.5%220+-14759.5%230+-12054.5%231+-11854.1%232+-12054.5%240++10349.3%241+-12054.5%250++12943.7%260++15938.6%267+-12054.5%270++19933.4%280++25128.5%290++31224.3%300++39120.4%310++49716.8%320++63013.7%330++79011.2%340++10208.9%350++12807.2%
Samuel SingletonFSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 43 ydsFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct28% of rushing production back price steady
15+-2000099.5%20+-300096.8%25+-140093.3%30+-75088.2%40+-140093.3%43++10050%50++47517.4%57+-12054.5%60++12007.7%64+-11553.5%70++25003.8%72+-12054.5%80++45002.2%90++80001.2%100++120000.8%110++150000.7%120++200000.5%130++50002%140++80001.2%150++120000.8%160++160000.6%170++200000.5%180++200000.5%190++130000.8%200++180000.6%210++190000.5%220++200000.5%
Ousmane KromahFSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 92 ydsFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct28% of rushing production back price steady
15+-1000099%20+-1000099%25+-370097.4%30+-192095%40+-78088.6%50+-40980.4%57+-12054.5%60+-24170.7%70+-15560.8%76+-12054.5%77+-11854.1%79+-12054.5%80+-10651.5%82+-11152.6%83+-12054.5%88+-12054.5%90+-12054.5%100++18235.5%110++24628.9%120++33323.1%130++45418.1%140++59414.4%150++77011.5%160++10408.8%170++12007.7%
Duce RobinsonFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 51 ydsFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct65% of receiving production back price steady
25+-1000099%40+-128092.8%49+-12054.5%50+-59085.5%51++10050%56+-12054.5%60+-32876.6%66+-12054.5%70+-20767.4%80+-13757.8%81+-11954.3%83+-11954.3%84+-11854.1%90++10748.3%100++15040%110++20832.5%120++28026.3%130++37521.1%140++49616.8%150++66013.2%160++88010.2%170++11607.9%
Trey HeddenNMSUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 177 ydsNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct40% of passing production back price steady
150+-18264.5%158+-12054.5%160+-14659.3%170+-11753.9%171+-11553.5%180++10648.5%190++13243.1%200++16238.2%205+-12054.5%210++20133.2%220++24828.7%223+-12054.5%224+-12054.5%230++31024.4%236+-12054.5%240++38920.4%250++49016.9%260++62013.9%270++78011.4%280++10208.9%290++12607.4%
Micahi DanzyFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 51 ydsFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct65% of receiving production backbet up +110 → +103
15+-390097.5%25+-92090.2%40+-27673.4%50+-15861.2%52++14041.7%54+-12154.8%55+-11753.9%56+-11854.1%57+-12054.5%58+-11753.9%60++10349.3%62+-12054.5%70++15539.2%75+-12054.5%80+-12054.5%90++33323.1%100++46317.8%110++64013.5%120++88010.2%130++11807.8%
Quintrevion WisnerFSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 49 ydsFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct28% of rushing production back price steady
5++27027%10+-540098.2%12+-12555.6%15+-166094.3%20+-77088.5%25+-44081.5%30+-28774.2%37+-11553.5%40+-14559.2%46+-10250.5%49+-10551.2%50++12045.5%54+-10551.2%60++19134.4%70++29325.4%80++43918.6%90++64013.5%100++9209.8%110++11408.1%120++11807.8%
Ashton DanielsFSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 45 ydsFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct28% of rushing production back price steady
10+-440097.8%15+-142093.4%18+-11553.5%20+-67087%21+-11052.4%22+-12054.5%25+-39279.7%27+-11553.5%28+-12054.5%30+-26072.2%39+-11954.3%40+-13357.1%42+-11753.9%50++12943.7%60++20932.4%70++32623.5%80++49516.8%90++73012%100++10408.8%
Dijon StanleyNMSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 10 ydsNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct81% of rushing production back price steady
7++10548.8%8+-13557.4%9+-12054.5%15++45018.2%16++14540.8%18++25028.6%20++65013.3%25++10009.1%30++16005.9%40++35002.8%50++65001.5%60++120000.8%70++190000.5%80++100001%90++150000.7%100++190000.5%110++180000.6%
Jayvan BoggsFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 36 ydsFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct65% of receiving production back price steady
1++15539.2%4+-12054.5%9+-12054.5%15+-27073%17+-12555.6%21+-12054.5%25+-11854.1%35+-11553.5%40++20932.4%50++34722.4%60++56914.9%70++9109.9%80++70012.5%90++9809.3%
James JonesNMSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 16 ydsNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct30% of receiving production back price steady
10++13043.5%11+-12555.6%14+-11553.5%25++23030.3%40++55015.4%50++10009.1%60++17005.6%70++30003.2%80++45002.2%90++65001.5%100++90001.1%110++140000.7%120++190000.5%
James JonesNMSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 32 ydsNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct81% of rushing production backdrifted -122 → -110
10+-116092.1%15+-49183.1%20+-27873.5%25+-17763.9%27+-12054.5%29+-12054.5%30+-11052.4%40++15439.4%50++26027.8%60++42719%70++67013%80++10408.8%
Brodie Malone-BradfordNMSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 75 ydsNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct30% of receiving production back price steady
71++11047.6%74+-12555.6%80++23529.9%90++55015.4%97++20532.8%100++12007.7%110++60014.3%120++14006.7%130++35002.8%140++70001.4%150++140000.7%
TJ PrideNMSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 12 ydsNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct30% of receiving production back price steady
4+-11553.5%6+-11553.5%9+-12054.5%25++25028.6%40++80011.1%50++22004.3%60++55001.8%70++150000.7%80++110000.9%90++160000.6%100++200000.5%
Tyler KingReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 49 ydsbet up +115 → +106
15+-138093.2%25+-45081.8%40+-15961.4%44+-12755.9%50++10648.5%60++16737.5%70++25428.2%80++37321.1%90++54715.5%100++78011.4%110++11208.2%
Samuel SingletonFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 54 ydsFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct65% of receiving production back price steady
54+-11553.5%55++45002.2%60++55001.8%70++130000.8%80++19005%90++45002.2%100++110000.9%110++200000.5%120++170000.6%130++140000.7%
Ousmane KromahFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 5 ydsFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct65% of receiving production back price steady
5+-12054.5%8++35022.2%25++70012.5%40++25003.8%50++55001.8%60++120000.8%70++170000.6%
AJ WilliamsNMSUReceiving yards
NMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct30% of receiving production back price steady
12+-11052.4%20+-11553.5%21+-11553.5%27+-12054.5%31+-11553.5%
Desirrio RilesFSUReceiving yards
FSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct65% of receiving production back price steady
1++21032.3%2+-12054.5%6+-11553.5%12+-12054.5%15+-11553.5%
TK KingNMSUReceiving yards
NMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct30% of receiving production back price steady
49+-12054.5%53+-12054.5%58+-12054.5%63+-12054.5%74+-12054.5%
AJ WilliamsNMSURushing yards
NMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct81% of rushing production back price steady
1++20532.8%3+-11052.4%5+-11052.4%8+-11553.5%
Dijon StanleyNMSUReceiving yards
NMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct30% of receiving production back price steady
1++12544.4%5++26527.4%
AJ WilliamsNMSUAnytime TD
3.2% to scoreNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct24% of overall production backdrifted +850 → +3000
Over+30003.2%
Ashton DanielsFSUAnytime TD
58.3% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted -170 → -140
Over-14058.3%
Brodie Malone-BradfordNMSUAnytime TD
5% to scoreNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct24% of overall production back price steady
Over+19005%
Carson Su'esu'eNMSUAnytime TD
1.6% to scoreNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct24% of overall production backdrifted +1800 → +6000
Over+60001.6%
Chase LoftinFSUAnytime TD
1.2% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +700 → +8000
Over+80001.2%
Desirrio RilesFSUAnytime TD
2% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +370 → +5000
Over+50002%
Devin CarterFSUAnytime TD
1.8% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +500 → +5500
Over+55001.8%
Dijon StanleyNMSUAnytime TD
3.2% to scoreNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct24% of overall production backdrifted +400 → +3000
Over+30003.2%
Duce RobinsonFSUAnytime TD
7.7% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted -185 → +1200
Over+12007.7%
Florida State D/STAnytime TD
3.4% to scoredrifted +390 → +2800
Over+28003.4%
James JonesNMSUAnytime TD
6.3% to scoreNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct24% of overall production backdrifted +205 → +1500
Over+15006.3%
Jasen LopezFSUAnytime TD
1.6% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +700 → +6000
Over+60001.6%
Jayvan BoggsFSUAnytime TD
2.4% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +290 → +4000
Over+40002.4%
Jerry LydiattNMSUAnytime TD
3.4% to scoreNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct24% of overall production backdrifted +850 → +2800
Over+28003.4%
Josiah ThomasNMSUReceiving yards
NMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct30% of receiving production backdrifted -105 → +245
1++24529%
Landen ThomasFSUAnytime TD
1.8% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +700 → +5500
Over+55001.8%
Lyndon RavareNMSUAnytime TD
1.5% to scoreNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct24% of overall production backdrifted +1600 → +6500
Over+65001.5%
Micahi DanzyFSUAnytime TD
3.8% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +160 → +2500
Over+25003.8%
Myles LibmanNMSUAnytime TD
1.8% to scoreNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct24% of overall production backdrifted +1500 → +5500
Over+55001.8%
Myles LibmanNMSUReceiving yards
NMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct30% of receiving production backdrifted +255 → +800
1++80011.1%
New Mexico State D/STAnytime TD
1.5% to scoredrifted +700 → +6500
Over+65001.5%
Ousmane KromahFSUAnytime TD
37.7% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted -290 → +165
Over+16537.7%
Quintrevion WisnerFSUAnytime TD
31.3% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted -215 → +220
Over+22031.3%
Samuel SingletonFSUAnytime TD
35.1% to scoreFSU implied 34 pts · favouredNew Mexico State D was middling — 48th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +135 → +185
Over+18535.1%
TJ PrideNMSURushing yards
NMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct81% of rushing production backdrifted +1800 → +4000
1++40002.4%
TJ WashingtonNMSUAnytime TD
5% to scoreNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct24% of overall production backdrifted +250 → +1900
Over+19005%
TK KingNMSUAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct24% of overall production backdrifted +310 → +600
Over+60014.3%
TK KingNMSURushing yards
NMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct81% of rushing production back price steady
1++28003.4%
Trey HeddenNMSUAnytime TD
2.4% to scoreNMSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct24% of overall production backdrifted +550 → +4000
Over+40002.4%

Memphis vs UNLV

Sat 10:00 PM ETtotal 48.558 props

Jai'Den ThomasUNLVRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 73 ydsUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct31% of rushing production back price steady
20+-1000099%25+-680098.6%30+-800098.8%40+-180094.7%49+-12054.5%50+-160094.1%60+-31075.6%65+-11553.5%67+-11052.4%70+-12555.6%71+-11553.5%80++16038.5%81+-12054.5%82+-13557.4%83+-13557.4%84+-11753.9%85+-11753.9%86+-12555.6%90++29525.3%100++50016.7%110++80011.1%120++14006.7%130++20004.8%140++30003.2%150++50002%160++75001.3%170++120000.8%180++180000.6%190++200000.5%200++35002.8%210++55001.8%220++65001.5%230++90001.1%240++120000.8%250++110000.9%260++130000.8%270++160000.6%280++180000.6%
Marcus StokesMEMPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 224 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct2% of passing production backbet up +155 → +100
50+-2000099.5%75+-500098%100+-180094.7%125+-75088.2%150+-38079.2%160+-50883.6%170+-39179.6%175+-20066.7%180+-30875.5%190+-24170.7%200+-11553.5%203+-11753.9%207+-12054.5%209+-11553.5%210+-15560.8%220+-12555.6%223+-12054.5%224+-11453.3%225++16038.5%230++10050%240++12444.6%250++29025.6%256+-12555.6%260++18834.7%264+-12054.5%270++23130.2%275++50016.7%280++28825.8%290++35921.8%300++10009.1%310++56914.9%320++72012.2%325++19005%330++9209.8%340++12007.7%350++40002.4%375++75001.3%400++160000.6%
Jackson ArnoldUNLVPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 150 ydsUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct4% of passing production backdrifted -166 → +100
50+-140093.3%75+-70087.5%100+-34077.3%125+-18564.9%145+-11553.5%150++10050%160+-13757.8%165+-11653.7%166+-11553.5%168+-11453.3%170+-10952.2%175++17536.4%180++11346.9%190++14041.7%200++31024.4%210++21331.9%220++26227.6%225++60014.3%230++32623.5%240++40819.7%250++11008.3%260++66013.2%270++82010.9%275++20004.8%280++10208.9%300++40002.4%318+-12054.5%325++90001.1%350++140000.7%
Dallan HaydenMEMRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 49 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct0% of rushing production back price steady
8++11047.6%10+-350097.2%15+-140093.3%20+-70087.5%25+-39079.6%30+-25571.8%40+-13056.5%42+-11553.5%47+-13256.9%50++13043.5%59+-11453.3%60++22031.3%62+-12255%63+-11653.7%70++34022.7%80++50016.7%90++75011.8%100++11008.3%110++17005.6%120++25003.8%130++35002.8%140++50002%150++80001.2%160++110000.9%170++150000.7%
Jaylin CarterMEMRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 58 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct0% of rushing production back price steady
10+-57585.2%15+-27573.3%20+-16562.3%24+-12054.5%25+-11052.4%30+-300096.8%36+-11753.9%40+-55084.6%50+-15560.8%53+-12054.5%58+-10551.2%60++14540.8%70++28526%80+-13557.4%82+-11052.4%85+-12054.5%90++19533.9%100++40020%110++75011.8%120++14006.7%130++22004.3%140++40002.4%150++65001.5%160++100001%170++190000.5%
Hunter TiptonMEMReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 39 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
15+-43181.2%25+-28574%31+-11753.9%32+-11453.3%33+-12054.5%34+-11753.9%36+-11753.9%39++10249.5%40+-11052.4%44+-11753.9%50++15040%60++24029.4%70++37021.3%80++50016.7%90++80011.1%100++11008.3%110++17005.6%120++25003.8%130++35002.8%140++50002%150++75001.3%160++110000.9%170++130000.8%180++150000.7%
Tychaun ChapmanMEMReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 33 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
15+-106091.4%25+-33076.7%32+-12054.5%35++14540.8%40+-12054.5%42+-11052.4%43+-11152.6%47+-12054.5%50++13542.6%52+-12054.5%60++22031.3%70++34022.7%80++50016.7%90++75011.8%100++11008.3%110++15006.3%120++20004.8%130++30003.2%140++45002.2%150++60001.6%160++80001.2%170++100001%180++130000.8%190++190000.5%
Taeshaun LyonsUNLVReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 58 ydsUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct14% of receiving production back price steady
15+-380097.4%25+-120092.3%31+-12054.5%40+-26072.2%50+-13557.4%53+-11052.4%56+-11753.9%60++13043.5%70++21032.3%80++32023.8%90++47517.4%100++70012.5%110++10009.1%120++15006.3%130++20004.8%140++30003.2%150++40002.4%160++60001.6%170++90001.1%180++100001%190++150000.7%200++190000.5%
Amorion WalkerUNLVReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 24 ydsUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct14% of receiving production backdrifted -300 → +110
1++80011.1%15+-56985.1%22+-11553.5%25++11047.6%35+-11453.3%38+-13256.9%39+-11453.3%40++27027%41+-11152.6%43+-11353.1%50++45018.2%60++75011.8%70++11008.3%80++18005.3%90++28003.4%100++40002.4%110++55001.8%120++80001.2%130++120000.8%140++160000.6%150++200000.5%
Jackson ArnoldUNLVRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 47 ydsUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct31% of rushing production backbet up +137 → -106
10+-53484.2%15+-26672.7%19+-12255%20+-15961.4%23+-12555.6%25+-10651.5%30+-70087.5%40+-18064.3%45+-12054.5%50++12544.4%60++23030.3%70++40020%80++70012.5%90++10009.1%91+-12054.5%100++18005.3%110++28003.4%120++40002.4%130++60001.6%140++90001.1%150++120000.8%
Brady KluseMEMReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 18 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
15+-28674.1%20++24029.4%25+-12054.5%26+-11954.3%27+-12054.5%38+-11353.1%40++20532.8%50++34022.7%60++55015.4%70++85010.5%80++14006.7%90++20004.8%100++30003.2%110++50002%120++70001.4%130++90001.1%140++120000.8%150++170000.6%
DeAngelo IrvinUNLVReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 32 ydsUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct14% of receiving production back price steady
15+-100090.9%25+-16061.5%30+-11553.5%40++16038.5%42+-11353.1%43+-12054.5%50++26527.4%60++42519%70++65013.3%80++10009.1%90++15006.3%100++22004.3%110++30003.2%120++40002.4%130++60001.6%140++80001.2%150++140000.7%160++180000.6%
Manny CoveyMEMRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 47 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct0% of rushing production back price steady
40+-22569.2%43+-11553.5%44+-12054.5%46+-11553.5%50++16537.7%60++38020.8%70++75011.8%80++14006.7%90++25003.8%100++40002.4%110++65001.5%120++100001%130++140000.7%140++200000.5%150++75001.3%160++90001.1%170++120000.8%180++180000.6%
Marcus StokesMEMRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 21 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct0% of rushing production backdrifted -479 → -105
10+-31075.6%15+-16562.3%18+-12555.6%20+-10551.2%25++14540.8%30++20532.8%37+-12054.5%40++37021.3%50++65013.3%56+-11553.5%60++10009.1%70++17005.6%80++28003.4%90++45002.2%100++65001.5%110++90001.1%120++170000.6%203+-12555.6%
Terrell TimmonsMEMReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 31 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
1++15006.3%15+-36378.4%25+-11553.5%26+-11353.1%29+-11753.9%30+-10952.2%40++22031.3%50++37021.3%60++60014.3%70++9509.5%80++15006.3%90++22004.3%100++30003.2%110++50002%120++75001.3%130++100001%140++140000.7%150++190000.5%
Jaylon GloverUNLVRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 27 ydsUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct31% of rushing production backbet up +400 → -110
10+-65086.7%15+-28574%20+-17063%25+-11553.5%30++13043.5%40++24029.4%50+-11052.4%60++70012.5%70++11008.3%80++17005.6%90++25003.8%100++40002.4%110++55001.8%120++100001%130++130000.8%140++150000.7%150++190000.5%
Jai'Den ThomasUNLVReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 24 ydsUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct14% of receiving production backdrifted -4900 → +110
15+-14559.2%18+-11353.1%21+-12054.5%25++11047.6%40++28026.3%50++47517.4%53+-12555.6%60++80011.1%70++13007.1%80++22004.3%90++30003.2%100++50002%110++75001.3%120++130000.8%130++150000.7%140++190000.5%
Jemyri DavisMEMReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 39 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
34+-12054.5%38+-12054.5%39+-11553.5%40++15539.2%50++36021.7%60++75011.8%63++22530.8%70++15006.3%80++28003.4%90++50002%100++80001.2%110++130000.8%120++120000.8%130++180000.6%
Taz ReddicksUNLVReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 25 ydsUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct14% of receiving production back price steady
22+-12555.6%25++10050%40++27526.7%46++12045.5%50++50016.7%60++85010.5%70++15006.3%80++22004.3%90++40002.4%100++55001.8%110++80001.2%120++110000.9%130++150000.7%140++190000.5%
Manny CoveyMEMReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 1 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
1+-11553.5%3++29525.3%4+-12555.6%6+-11553.5%10+-11553.5%25++30025%40++85010.5%50++15006.3%60++28003.4%70++45002.2%80++75001.3%90++120000.8%100++170000.6%
Jaylin CarterMEMReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 10 ydsMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
1++20532.8%8+-11553.5%25++34022.7%40++9509.5%50++18005.3%60++35002.8%70++60001.6%80++90001.1%90++130000.8%
Jermane HayesMEMReceiving yards
MEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct11% of receiving production backdrifted +105 → +320
23++32023.8%40++42519%50++10009.1%60++22004.3%70++40002.4%80++70001.4%90++140000.7%
Keyan BurnettUNLVReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 23 ydsUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct14% of receiving production back price steady
15+-18965.4%21+-11353.1%25++11746.1%40++28625.9%50++48317.2%60++79011.2%70++12607.4%
Phillippe Laforgekick pts
market midpoint ≈ 5 price steady
4+-14559.2%6++12045.5%10++22530.8%
Ramon Villelakick pts
drifted -140 → +105
5++12045.5%6++10548.8%7+-11553.5%
Alante BrownMEMAnytime TD
4.3% to scoreMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct6% of overall production backdrifted +400 → +2200
Over+22004.3%
Alante BrownMEMReceiving yards
MEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct11% of receiving production backdrifted +360 → +1100
1++11008.3%
Amorion WalkerUNLVAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted +265 → +1100
Over+11008.3%
Brady KluseMEMAnytime TD
7.1% to scoreMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct6% of overall production backdrifted +240 → +1300
Over+13007.1%
Brady KluseMEMRushing yards
MEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct0% of rushing production backdrifted +2500 → +6000
1++60001.6%
Bryce DorseyMEMAnytime TD
3.2% to scoreMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct6% of overall production backdrifted +750 → +3000
Over+30003.2%
Dallan HaydenMEMAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct6% of overall production backdrifted -145 → +500
Over+50016.7%
Dallan HaydenMEMReceiving yards
MEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
1++90010%
Darrien JonesUNLVAnytime TD
12.5% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted +200 → +700
Over+70012.5%
DeAngelo IrvinUNLVAnytime TD
7.1% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted +370 → +1300
Over+13007.1%
DeAngelo IrvinUNLVRushing yards
UNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct31% of rushing production back price steady
1++20004.8%
Hunter TiptonMEMAnytime TD
18.2% to scoreMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct6% of overall production backdrifted +270 → +450
Over+45018.2%
Jackson ArnoldUNLVAnytime TD
47.6% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted -145 → +110
Over+11047.6%
Jai'Den ThomasUNLVAnytime TD
31.3% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted -270 → +220
Over+22031.3%
Jaylin CarterMEMAnytime TD
38.5% to scoreMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct6% of overall production backdrifted -140 → +160
Over+16038.5%
Jaylon GloverUNLVAnytime TD
19% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted -105 → +425
Over+42519%
Jemyri DavisMEMRushing yards
MEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct0% of rushing production back price steady
1++50002%
Kayden McGeeUNLVAnytime TD
6.7% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted +550 → +1400
Over+14006.7%
Keyan BurnettUNLVAnytime TD
9.1% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted +265 → +1000
Over+10009.1%
Manny CoveyMEMAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct6% of overall production backdrifted +230 → +1100
Over+11008.3%
Marcus StokesMEMAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct6% of overall production backdrifted +105 → +600
Over+60014.3%
Matt ByrnesUNLVAnytime TD
4.3% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted +650 → +2200
Over+22004.3%
Memphis D/STAnytime TD
4.8% to scoredrifted +650 → +2000
Over+20004.8%
Stonka BurnsideMEMAnytime TD
7.1% to scoreMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct6% of overall production backdrifted +750 → +1300
Over+13007.1%
Taeshaun LyonsUNLVAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted +145 → +600
Over+60014.3%
Taeshaun LyonsUNLVRushing yards
UNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct31% of rushing production back price steady
1++65001.5%
Taz ReddicksUNLVAnytime TD
9.1% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted +280 → +1000
Over+10009.1%
Taz ReddicksUNLVRushing yards
UNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct31% of rushing production back price steady
1++70001.4%
Terrell TimmonsMEMAnytime TD
3.4% to scoreMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct6% of overall production backdrifted +500 → +2800
Over+28003.4%
Troy StellatoUNLVAnytime TD
6.7% to scoreUNLV implied 21.5 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct15% of overall production backdrifted +400 → +1400
Over+14006.7%
Tychaun ChapmanMEMAnytime TD
7.7% to scoreMEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct6% of overall production backdrifted +200 → +1200
Over+12007.7%
Tychaun ChapmanMEMRushing yards
MEM implied 27 pts · favouredUNLV D was soft — 24th pct0% of rushing production back price steady
1++19005%
UNLV D/STAnytime TD
4.3% to scoredrifted +500 → +2200
Over+22004.3%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed three times a day; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.