NCAA Tournament 2026
March Madness Analytics Hub
1st Round
60/60 games complete#1 Seeds:
Florida
Arizona
Duke
Michigan

F

A

D

M
Today's Games
0 gamesNo games scheduled today
Bobby's Picks
AI-poweredSouth Region

F

H

I

N
(1) Florida(2) Houston(3) Illinois(4) Nebraska
West Region

A

P

G

A
(1) Arizona(2) Purdue(3) Gonzaga(4) Arkansas
East Region

D

U

M

K
(1) Duke(2) UConn(3) Michigan State(4) Kansas
Midwest Region

M

I

V

A
(1) Michigan(2) Iowa State(3) Virginia(4) Alabama
Region Strength
South
#2Avg. Rank: #22
Ranked Teams: 7

F
West
EasiestAvg. Rank: #29
Ranked Teams: 6

A
East
#3Avg. Rank: #22
Ranked Teams: 6

D
Midwest
ToughestAvg. Rank: #19
Ranked Teams: 6

M
Cinderella Watch
Dark horse teams seeded 10+ with the analytics profile to make a deep tournament run. Scored 0-100 based on efficiency, defense, and resume quality.

S
(10) Santa ClaraMidwest83/100
R1 vs (7) Kentucky
Strong efficiency ranking (#30)
Potent offense (125.0 adj. O)
Battle-tested: 4-5 in Q1 games
Limited resume against top competition
26-9Eff. #30WCC

T
(10) Texas A&MSouth78/100
R1 vs (7) Saint Mary's
Strong efficiency ranking (#39)
Stingy defense (101.4 adj. D)
Potent offense (119.5 adj. O)
Limited resume against top competition
22-12Eff. #39SEC

T
(11) TexasWest75/100
R1 vs (11) NC State
Strong efficiency ranking (#38)
Potent offense (124.1 adj. O)
Battle-tested: 4-4 in Q1 games
Limited resume against top competition
21-15Eff. #38SEC

S
(11) South FloridaEast73/100
R1 vs (6) Louisville
Strong efficiency ranking (#50)
Stingy defense (101.4 adj. D)
Potent offense (117.0 adj. O)
Limited resume against top competition
25-9Eff. #50Amer

V
(11) VCUSouth73/100
R1 vs (6) North Carolina
Strong efficiency ranking (#46)
Potent offense (118.5 adj. O)
Battle-tested: 6-3 in Q1 games
Limited resume against top competition
28-8Eff. #46A10

N
(11) NC StateWest58/100
R1 vs (11) Texas
Strong efficiency ranking (#41)
Potent offense (123.0 adj. O)
Limited resume against top competition
20-14Eff. #41ACC

H
(12) High PointWest48/100
R1 vs (5) Wisconsin
Potent offense (116.7 adj. O)
Battle-tested: 7-2 in Q1 games
Lower efficiency ranking (#85)
31-5Eff. #85Big South

H
(16) HowardMidwest38/100
R1 vs (16) UMBC
Conference champion / auto-bid winner
Limited resume against top competition

U
(16) UMBCMidwest38/100
R1 vs (16) Howard
Conference champion / auto-bid winner
Limited resume against top competition
Tournament Tracker
First Four
4/4
1st Round
32/32
8 upsets
2nd Round
16/16
4 upsets
Sweet 16
4/4
1 upset
Elite 8
4/4
1 upset
Historical Seed Upset Rates
How often lower seeds pull off upsets in the first round, based on tournament history since 1985.
1 vs 16
1.2%
2 vs 15
6.3%
3 vs 14
15.2%
4 vs 13
21.5%
5 vs 12
35.4%
6 vs 11
37.3%
7 vs 10
39.2%
8 vs 9
48.7%
Full Bracket
All rounds, all regions — detailed bracket with scores and analysis links.
Today's Picks
AI-powered spread, total, and ML picks with detailed analysis.
Power Rankings
Team efficiency rankings, sortable by offense, defense, and net rating.
Futures
Championship odds and Final Four probabilities from major sportsbooks.
Last updated: 3/30/2026, 8:33:57 AM ET









































