Monday, August 24, 2026
Eight Popular Picks Priced Above Their 2025 Production
Several familiar names require drafters to pay well beyond what last season’s scoring supported, raising the cost of every missed alternative.
Bobby's AI Desk·written from our own draft-market and 2025 production data·how this works
Takeaways
- → Require a clear improvement case before paying above what 2025 production supported.
- → Compare every popular pick with players available one or two rounds later.
- → Use discounted receivers to preserve flexibility at running back and quarterback.
In this piece
Draft hype is not automatically wrong, but it is never free. ADP, the average spot where a player is selected, shows exactly how much of the optimistic case your league has already priced into a pick.
The question is not whether you like a player. It is whether his 2026 price makes sense against what he produced last season and what you must pass up to select him.
The fifth-round hype cluster
Luther Burden III has an ADP of 5.11 after scoring 8.5 PPR points per game in 2025. That 2026 draft price is 24 picks earlier than last season’s production supports. Bhayshul Tuten carries the same 24-pick premium at 5.05 after averaging 5.9 points.
The pattern continues with DJ Moore, whose 5.01 price is 19 picks earlier than his 10.1-point average supports, and Mike Evans, whose 5.06 ADP is 15 picks earlier than his 10.6-point average supports.
That does not make any of them undraftable. It means the market requires improvement merely to justify the price. Opportunity cost, the value of the player or roster path you surrender, is especially meaningful when several similarly priced picks carry that requirement.
Early-round names demand a bigger leap
The tax matters more near the top because those picks are harder to replace. Justin Jefferson is being selected at 1.12, 15 picks earlier than his 2025 production supports. He averaged 11.9 PPR points, ranking 22nd among wide receivers in per-game production.
At the turn, that price can be compared with James Cook III at 2.01, who averaged 17.8 points, or Chase Brown at 2.01, who averaged 16.6 last season. This is not a position-for-position verdict. It is the production bar Jefferson’s optimistic case must clear.
Kenneth Walker presents a similar decision at 2.10. His 11.3-point average ranked 26th among running backs, while his 2026 price is 15 picks earlier than that production supports. Use the Draft Kit to decide where your personal tier ends before the clock starts.
Quarterback hype has later-round competition
Joe Burrow costs 5.10 after averaging 16.8 points across 8 games last season. His price is 16 picks earlier than that production supports. The boom/bust split, meaning how often a player delivered a major score or a low one, adds context: Burrow topped 20 points in 50% of his games but fell below 8 in 25%.
Later quarterbacks supplied stronger full-season scoring samples. Matthew Stafford averaged 20.6 points across 17 games with a 7.05 ADP, while Trevor Lawrence averaged 19.9 across 17 and goes at 8.08. Paying for Burrow means declining those later prices and using the fifth-round pick elsewhere.
Discounts create room for patience
Value means production relative to acquisition cost. Wan'Dale Robinson goes at 8.02 after averaging 13.6 points across 16 games; his 2026 price is 27 picks later than his 2025 production supports. Quentin Johnston averaged 13.2 across 13 games and is drafted 24 picks later than that production supports at 8.11.
Deeper still, Jauan Jennings averaged 11.6 across 15 games, yet his 13.05 price is 32 picks later than last season’s production supports. Those discounts can make it easier to reject an expensive middle-round story.
How to use this: Set a maximum price for every hype pick, then compare the player with the next two rounds rather than evaluating him alone. Check role assumptions in the Usage Report, and save the Anytime TD Board for weekly scoring decisions once the season begins.
Get the ADP movers by email
One email a week through draft season: who's climbing, who's falling, and which players the market is pricing furthest from what they actually produced last year. Free — no account needed.
Weekly through Week 1. No spam, unsubscribe any time.