College Player Props
Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 836 players across 35 games.
No hit rates here, on purpose
We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.
These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.
Alabama vs Tennessee
Sat 3:30 PM ETtotal 51.533 props- Keelon RussellALAPassing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 267 ydsALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct12% of passing production backdrifted -119 → -109150+-186094.9%160+-130092.9%170+-96090.6%180+-72087.8%190+-54384.4%200+-43081.1%210+-33577%220+-26572.6%230+-20967.6%240+-16962.8%250+-13557.4%256+-11753.9%257+-11653.7%260+-10952.2%262+-11453.3%263+-11453.3%270++11346.9%280++14041.7%290++17436.5%300++21831.4%310++27127%320++33722.9%330++42619%340++53615.7%350++68012.8%360++86010.4%370++11008.3%380++12007.7%
- DeSean BishopTENNRushing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 95 ydsTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct48% of rushing production back price steady
- Lotzeir BrooksALAReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 69 ydsALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct41% of receiving production back price steady
- Mike MatthewsTENNReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 62 ydsTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct52% of receiving production backbet up +107 → -109
- Braylon StaleyTENNReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 49 ydsTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct52% of receiving production back price steady
- Trae'shawn BrownALARushing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 59 ydsALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct-67% of rushing production back price steady
- Rico ScottALAReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 61 ydsALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct41% of receiving production backdrifted -112 → -104
- Keelon RussellALARushing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 27 ydsALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct-67% of rushing production backbet up -103 → -115
- Kaleb EdwardsALAReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 20 ydsALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct41% of receiving production back price steady
- Cooper Ranvierfgmmarket midpoint ≈ 2 price steady
- Alabama D/STAnytime TD19% to score price steady
- Braylon StaleyTENNAnytime TD25% to scoreTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct35% of overall production back price steady
- Daniel HillALAAnytime TD51.2% to scoreALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct26% of overall production backdrifted -140 → -105
- DaSaahn BrameTENNAnytime TD18.2% to scoreTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct35% of overall production backbet up +650 → +450
- Daune MorrisTENNAnytime TD31.3% to scoreTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct35% of overall production backdrifted +175 → +220
- Derek MeadowsALAAnytime TD20% to scoreALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct26% of overall production back price steady
- DeSean BishopTENNAnytime TD65.5% to scoreTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct35% of overall production backbet up -175 → -190
- EJ CrowellALAAnytime TD35.7% to scoreALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct26% of overall production backdrifted +145 → +180
- Faizon BrandonTENNAnytime TD42.6% to scoreTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct35% of overall production back price steady
- Javin GordonTENNAnytime TD15.4% to scoreTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct35% of overall production backdrifted +425 → +550
- Kaleb EdwardsALAAnytime TD20% to scoreALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct26% of overall production backbet up +550 → +400
- Keelon RussellALAAnytime TD56.5% to scoreALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct26% of overall production back price steady
- Kevin RileyALAAnytime TD17.4% to scoreALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct26% of overall production back price steady
- Lotzeir BrooksALAAnytime TD44.4% to scoreALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct26% of overall production back price steady
- Marshall PritchettALAAnytime TD20% to scoreALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct26% of overall production backbet up +550 → +400
- Mike MatthewsTENNAnytime TD32.3% to scoreTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct35% of overall production backdrifted +185 → +210
- Radarious JacksonTENNAnytime TD15.4% to scoreTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct35% of overall production back price steady
- Rico ScottALAAnytime TD44.4% to scoreALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct26% of overall production backdrifted +115 → +125
- Tennessee D/STAnytime TD16.7% to score price steady
- TK KeysTENNAnytime TD9.1% to scoreTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct35% of overall production back price steady
- Trae'shawn BrownALAAnytime TD55.6% to scoreALA implied 30 pts · favouredTennessee D was soft — 21th pct26% of overall production back price steady
- Travis SmithTENNAnytime TD7.1% to scoreTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct35% of overall production back price steady
- Trent ThomasTENNAnytime TD9.1% to scoreTENN implied 21.5 pts · underdogAlabama D was tough — 84th pct35% of overall production back price steady
Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.
