College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 836 players across 35 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Florida State vs Miami FL

Sat 7:00 PM ETtotal 56.535 props

Darian MensahMIAPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 284 ydsMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct6% of passing production backbet up +107 → -108
150+-240096%160+-250096.2%170+-174094.6%180+-128092.8%190+-94090.4%200+-71087.7%210+-53484.2%220+-41680.6%230+-32476.4%240+-25571.8%250+-20567.2%260+-16562.3%263+-11753.9%264+-11854.1%268+-11353.1%269+-11653.7%270+-13357.1%271+-11854.1%272+-11252.8%273+-11954.3%276+-11854.1%280+-10851.9%290++11546.5%300++14241.3%310++17536.4%320++21731.5%330++26827.2%340++33622.9%350++42319.1%360++53215.8%370++67013%380++85010.5%390++10808.5%
Ashton DanielsFSUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 196 ydsFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct13% of passing production backdrifted -113 → -106
150+-25571.8%160+-20467.1%170+-16261.8%180+-13056.5%184+-11553.5%186+-11553.5%187+-11453.3%188+-11252.8%189+-11653.7%190+-10651.5%191+-11854.1%200++11845.9%210++14640.7%220++18135.6%230++22630.7%240++28026.3%250++34622.4%260++43618.7%270++53715.7%280++67013%290++84010.6%300++10808.5%310++12807.2%
Malachi ToneyMIAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 110 ydsMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct45% of receiving production backbet up +112 → -101
40+-310096.9%50+-184094.8%60+-87089.7%70+-49483.2%80+-30975.6%90+-20066.7%97+-12154.8%99+-12054.5%100+-14158.5%101+-11854.1%103+-12154.8%104+-11854.1%105+-11954.3%110+-10150.2%120++13642.4%130++18335.3%140++24229.2%150++31823.9%160++41319.5%170++53715.7%180++70012.5%190++90010%200++11607.9%
Mark FletcherMIARushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 92 ydsMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct91% of rushing production back price steady
30+-310096.9%40+-120092.3%50+-58185.3%60+-33677.1%70+-21768.5%80+-14959.8%85+-11753.9%86+-11553.5%87+-11653.7%88+-11353.1%90+-10651.5%100++12943.7%110++17436.5%120++23130.2%130++30124.9%140++39120.4%150++50416.6%160++66013.2%170++83010.8%180++10208.9%
Ousmane KromahFSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 65 ydsFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct28% of rushing production backdrifted -131 → -103
20+-220095.7%25+-110091.7%30+-64086.5%40+-29574.7%50+-16662.4%56+-12455.4%57+-11653.7%58+-11453.3%59+-11553.5%60+-10350.7%61+-12355.2%62+-12154.8%70++14640.7%80++21731.5%90++31124.3%100++43418.7%110++60014.3%120++81011%130++11408.1%140++12207.6%
Cooper BarkateMIAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 63 ydsMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct45% of receiving production backdrifted -120 → -110
15+-240096%25+-116092.1%40+-33677.1%50+-18464.8%51+-12154.8%52+-11052.4%53+-12355.2%56+-12154.8%59+-11854.1%60+-11353.1%70++13542.6%80++19633.8%90++27926.4%100++39320.3%110++54615.5%120++73012%130++9909.2%
Micahi DanzyFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 51 ydsFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct65% of receiving production backdrifted -119 → -103
15+-168094.4%25+-52183.9%40+-17663.8%44+-11653.7%45+-12755.9%46+-12655.8%47+-12255%48+-11954.3%49+-12255%50+-10350.7%60++15439.4%70++23829.6%80++35122.2%90++50516.5%100++70012.5%110++10009.1%120++12807.2%
Duce RobinsonFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 50 ydsFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct65% of receiving production backbet up +113 → +100
15+-164094.3%25+-49883.3%40+-16962.8%43+-11252.8%44+-11252.8%45+-11252.8%46+-11854.1%47+-11753.9%50++10050%60++15639.1%70++23529.9%80++34622.4%90++50416.6%100++72012.2%110++9909.2%
Ashton DanielsFSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 37 ydsFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct28% of rushing production back price steady
10+-170094.4%15+-70087.5%20+-37979.1%25+-23269.9%29+-11052.4%30+-15861.2%33+-12154.8%34+-11954.3%40++12245%50++21132.2%60++34222.6%70++53415.8%80++81011%90++12007.7%
Jayvan BoggsFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 35 ydsFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct65% of receiving production back price steady
15+-38779.5%25+-16462.1%29+-12455.4%30+-11653.7%31+-11553.5%32+-11353.1%33+-11553.5%40++15339.5%50++25028.6%60++40819.7%70++61014.1%80++9309.7%90++12807.2%
Daylyn UpshawMIAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 31 ydsMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct45% of receiving production back price steady
15+-30675.4%25+-13357.1%27+-11553.5%28+-11653.7%29+-11653.7%40++19134.4%50++31324.2%60++49816.7%70++78011.4%80++11807.8%
Elija LoftonMIAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 29 ydsMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct45% of receiving production back price steady
15+-26772.8%24+-12255%25+-11854.1%26+-11854.1%27+-11854.1%40++21431.8%50++35522%60++56914.9%70++88010.2%80++12607.4%
Ousmane KromahFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 17 ydsFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct65% of receiving production back price steady
15+-12054.5%16+-11052.4%25++18135.6%40++45618%50++79011.2%60++12807.2%
Ashton DanielsFSUAnytime TD
45.5% to scoreFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+12045.5%
Chris Wheatley-HumphreyMIAAnytime TD
21.3% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+37021.3%
Cooper BarkateMIAAnytime TD
53.5% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production backbet up -105 → -115
Over-11553.5%
Darian MensahMIAAnytime TD
26% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+28526%
Daylyn UpshawMIAAnytime TD
39.2% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+15539.2%
Desirrio RilesFSUAnytime TD
11.8% to scoreFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+75011.8%
Duce RobinsonFSUAnytime TD
31.7% to scoreFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+21531.7%
Elija LoftonMIAAnytime TD
40.8% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production backbet up +155 → +145
Over+14540.8%
Florida State D/STAnytime TD
10.5% to scoredrifted +700 → +850
Over+85010.5%
Girard PringleMIAAnytime TD
35.1% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+18535.1%
Javian MalloryMIAAnytime TD
50% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+10050%
Jayvan BoggsFSUAnytime TD
23.8% to scoreFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production backbet up +350 → +320
Over+32023.8%
Landen ThomasFSUAnytime TD
11.8% to scoreFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+75011.8%
Malachi ToneyMIAAnytime TD
70.6% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over-24070.6%
Mark FletcherMIAAnytime TD
73% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production backdrifted -300 → -270
Over-27073%
Miami FL D/STAnytime TD
20.4% to score price steady
Over+39020.4%
Micahi DanzyFSUAnytime TD
27.4% to scoreFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+26527.4%
Ousmane KromahFSUAnytime TD
51.2% to scoreFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over-10551.2%
Quintrevion WisnerFSUAnytime TD
22.7% to scoreFSU implied 17.5 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+34022.7%
Somourian WingoMIAAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Vance SpaffordMIAAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Vandrevius JacobsMIAAnytime TD
18.2% to scoreMIA implied 39 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+45018.2%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.