College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 836 players across 35 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Washington vs Purdue

Fri 8:00 PM ETtotal 51.540 props

Elijah BrownWASHPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 259 ydsWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct94% of passing production backdrifted -142 → -106
150+-130092.9%160+-97090.7%170+-73088%180+-55784.8%190+-42581%200+-33477%210+-26072.2%220+-20767.4%230+-16562.3%240+-13156.7%244+-11653.7%245+-11553.5%246+-11553.5%250+-10651.5%252+-11954.3%253+-11854.1%254+-11653.7%255+-11653.7%259+-11653.7%260++11746.1%270++14640.7%280++18135.6%290++22231.1%300++27626.6%310++34622.4%320++43318.8%330++54615.5%340++68012.8%350++86010.4%360++10808.5%370++11807.8%
Ryan BrownePURPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 249 ydsPUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct97% of passing production backdrifted -103 → +106
150+-110091.7%160+-81089%170+-62086.1%180+-47482.6%190+-36478.4%200+-28674.1%210+-22769.4%220+-18164.4%230+-14559.2%240+-11753.9%242+-11453.3%244+-11653.7%245+-11653.7%246+-11553.5%250++10648.5%260++13243.1%270++16537.7%280++20532.8%290++25528.2%300++31724%310++39620.2%320++49816.7%330++63013.7%340++79011.2%350++10208.9%360++12407.5%
Fame IjeboiPURRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 94 ydsPUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct61% of rushing production back price steady
40+-128092.8%50+-66086.8%60+-37278.8%70+-23570.1%80+-15961.4%86+-11954.3%87+-11954.3%88+-11954.3%89+-11653.7%90+-11252.8%100++12145.2%110++16338%120++21731.5%130++28825.8%140++37421.1%150++47617.4%160++62013.9%170++79011.2%180++10009.1%190++12607.4%
Chauncey MagwoodPURReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 40 ydsPUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct22% of receiving production backdrifted -176 → +105
15+-66086.8%25+-24671.1%35+-11653.7%36+-11353.1%37+-11453.3%38+-11453.3%39+-11353.1%40++10548.8%44+-11854.1%45+-11252.8%46+-12655.8%50++17636.2%60++27426.7%70++42119.2%80++64013.5%90++9209.8%100++11408.1%110++11208.2%
Chris LawsonWASHReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 57 ydsWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct34% of receiving production backdrifted -145 → -114
15+-210095.5%25+-59085.5%40+-19566.1%48+-12655.8%49+-12555.6%50+-11453.3%52+-12054.5%53+-12154.8%54+-11854.1%55+-11954.3%60++14041.7%70++20932.4%80++31324.2%90++45618%100++63013.7%110++89010.1%120++12407.5%130++12607.4%
Dezmen RoebuckWASHReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 66 ydsWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct34% of receiving production back price steady
25+-128092.8%40+-35878.2%50+-19866.4%58+-11954.3%59+-12054.5%60+-12455.4%61+-11854.1%62+-11553.5%63+-11353.1%64+-11353.1%70++12544.4%80++18135.6%90++25827.9%100++36521.5%110++50716.5%120++70012.5%130++9409.6%140++12607.4%
Asaad WaseemPURReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 62 ydsPUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct22% of receiving production back price steady
15+-290096.7%25+-76088.4%40+-24470.9%47+-12655.8%48+-12255%50+-14058.3%53+-12054.5%54+-11954.3%55+-10851.9%60+-10851.9%70++14640.7%80++22031.3%90++32323.6%100++46117.8%110++65013.3%120++89010.1%130++11408.1%
Brian BonnerWASHRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 69 ydsWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct52% of rushing production backbet up +120 → +105
20+-310096.9%25+-168094.4%30+-95090.5%40+-42581%50+-23370%60+-14559.2%61+-12054.5%62+-12455.4%64+-12255%70++10548.8%80++15339.5%90++22031.3%100++30824.5%110++42918.9%120++58614.6%130++79011.2%140++10608.6%
Rashid WilliamsWASHReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 40 ydsWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct34% of receiving production backdrifted -132 → +104
15+-66086.8%25+-25071.4%37+-11453.3%38+-11753.9%39+-11653.7%40++10449%41+-11152.6%42+-11653.7%50++17536.4%60++27626.6%70++42719%80++65013.3%90++9409.6%100++12407.5%110++12807.2%
Xavier TownsendPURReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 44 ydsPUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct22% of receiving production back price steady
15+-92090.2%25+-32376.4%40+-12054.5%41+-11453.3%42+-11252.8%50++13842%60++21631.6%70++32923.3%80++49116.9%90++71012.3%100++10009.1%
Decker DeGraafWASHReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 30 ydsWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct34% of receiving production back price steady
15+-26572.6%25+-11954.3%26+-11854.1%27+-11553.5%28+-11653.7%40++21331.9%50++35422%60++57014.9%70++90010%80++12007.7%
Baron NaoneWASHReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 21 ydsWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct34% of receiving production backdrifted -120 → -111
15+-14859.7%18+-11553.5%19+-11152.6%20+-11653.7%25++14640.7%40++36821.4%50++64013.5%60++10608.6%70++12607.4%
George BurhennPURReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 22 ydsPUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct22% of receiving production back price steady
15+-16061.5%19+-11453.3%20+-11653.7%25++13642.4%40++34322.6%50++59414.4%60++9809.3%
Ansu SanoeWASHAnytime TD
18.2% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production backdrifted +390 → +450
Over+45018.2%
Antonio HarrisPURAnytime TD
21.3% to scorePUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct48% of overall production backdrifted +295 → +370
Over+37021.3%
Asaad WaseemPURAnytime TD
37% to scorePUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct48% of overall production backdrifted +145 → +170
Over+17037%
Baron NaoneWASHAnytime TD
23.3% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production backdrifted +295 → +330
Over+33023.3%
Brian BonnerWASHAnytime TD
45.5% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production back price steady
Over+12045.5%
Chauncey MagwoodPURAnytime TD
29.9% to scorePUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct48% of overall production backdrifted +200 → +235
Over+23529.9%
Chris LawsonWASHAnytime TD
35.1% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production back price steady
Over+18535.1%
De'Nylon MorrissettePURAnytime TD
19% to scorePUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct48% of overall production backbet up +500 → +425
Over+42519%
Decker DeGraafWASHAnytime TD
20% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production backdrifted +340 → +400
Over+40020%
Dezmen RoebuckWASHAnytime TD
50% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production back price steady
Over+10050%
Elijah BrownWASHAnytime TD
22.7% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production backdrifted +250 → +340
Over+34022.7%
Fame IjeboiPURAnytime TD
78.7% to scorePUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct48% of overall production backdrifted -450 → -370
Over-37078.7%
George BurhennPURAnytime TD
14.3% to scorePUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct48% of overall production back price steady
Over+60014.3%
Jacobo Echeverria Lozanofgm
price steady
2++10050%
Jerrick GibsonPURAnytime TD
15.4% to scorePUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct48% of overall production backdrifted +425 → +550
Over+55015.4%
Jordan ClayWASHAnytime TD
20.4% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production back price steady
Over+39020.4%
Mason JamesWASHAnytime TD
15.4% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production back price steady
Over+55015.4%
Purdue D/STAnytime TD
17.4% to score price steady
Over+47517.4%
Rashid WilliamsWASHAnytime TD
35.1% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production back price steady
Over+18535.1%
Ryan BrownePURAnytime TD
27.4% to scorePUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct48% of overall production back price steady
Over+26527.4%
Tra'Mar HarrisPURAnytime TD
18.2% to scorePUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct48% of overall production back price steady
Over+45018.2%
Travis TerrellPURAnytime TD
16.7% to scorePUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct48% of overall production backdrifted +425 → +500
Over+50016.7%
Trey CooleyWASHAnytime TD
30.3% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production backdrifted +195 → +230
Over+23030.3%
Trez DavisWASHAnytime TD
18.2% to scoreWASH implied 24 pts · underdogPurdue D was soft — 4th pct54% of overall production back price steady
Over+45018.2%
Tyler Roblesfgm
price steady
1+-28574%
Washington D/STAnytime TD
17.4% to score price steady
Over+47517.4%
Xavier TownsendPURAnytime TD
41.7% to scorePUR implied 27.5 pts · favouredWashington D was tough — 71th pct48% of overall production backdrifted +125 → +140
Over+14041.7%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.