College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 836 players across 35 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Northwestern vs Michigan State

Sat 12:00 PM ETtotal 48.531 props

Aidan ChilesNWPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 228 ydsdrifted -102 → +107
150+-62086.1%160+-47182.5%170+-36478.4%180+-28674.1%190+-22669.3%200+-18264.5%210+-14659.3%220+-11653.7%221+-11553.5%225+-11453.3%230++10748.3%240++13243.1%250++16437.9%260++20333%270++25328.3%280++31024.4%290++38920.4%300++48417.1%310++62013.9%320++81011%330++10208.9%340++12807.2%
Jaziun PattersonMSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 90 ydsMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct19% of rushing production back price steady
30+-310096.9%40+-108091.5%50+-53284.2%60+-31275.7%70+-20266.9%80+-14158.5%84+-11753.9%85+-11854.1%86+-11653.7%90++10050%100++13742.2%110++18734.8%120++24928.7%130++32623.5%140++43118.8%150++55415.3%160++71012.3%170++9209.8%180++11807.8%
Griffin WildeNWReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 90 ydsdrifted -113 → -101
40+-140093.3%50+-64086.5%60+-35978.2%70+-22168.8%80+-14559.2%84+-11453.3%86+-11653.7%87+-12655.8%90+-10150.2%100++14041.7%110++19334.1%120++26127.7%130++34922.3%140++46617.7%150++61014.1%160++79011.2%170++10408.8%180++12607.4%
Alessio MilivojevicMSUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 183 ydsMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct16% of passing production back price steady
150+-20867.5%160+-16662.4%170+-13457.3%175+-12054.5%178+-11252.8%180+-10851.9%190++11646.3%200++14341.2%210++17736.1%220++22231.1%230++27826.5%240++34722.4%250++44218.5%260++55615.2%270++69012.7%280++86010.4%290++10808.5%
Caleb KomolafeNWRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 83 yds price steady
30+-210095.5%40+-79088.8%50+-41680.6%60+-24971.3%70+-16261.8%78+-12054.5%80+-11252.8%90++12843.9%100++17736.1%110++24029.4%120++32223.7%130++42219.2%140++54915.4%150++70012.5%160++9109.9%170++11807.8%
Chrishon McCrayMSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 39 ydsMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct24% of receiving production back price steady
15+-64086.5%25+-24871.3%36+-11954.3%37+-11653.7%40++10648.5%50++18035.7%60++29125.6%70++43918.6%80++63013.7%90++9309.7%100++12407.5%
Drew WagnerNWReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 37 yds price steady
15+-47182.5%25+-19766.3%33+-11453.3%34+-11353.1%35+-11553.5%40++13342.9%50++22031.3%60++34522.5%70++51916.2%80++78011.4%90++11408.1%
Aidan ChilesNWRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 23 ydsbet up +124 → +114
10+-42781%15+-21968.7%20+-13156.7%21+-12054.5%25++11446.7%30++16338%40++29925.1%50++51016.4%60++85010.5%70++12807.2%
Fredrick MooreMSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 35 ydsMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct24% of receiving production backdrifted -126 → -117
15+-45281.9%25+-18965.4%32+-11753.9%33+-11753.9%40++13941.8%50++23030.3%60++37021.3%70++56215.1%80++83010.8%90++12207.6%
Jayden SavouryMSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 33 ydsMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct24% of receiving production back price steady
15+-39379.7%25+-16762.5%29+-13156.7%30+-11954.3%40++15139.8%50++25628.1%60++41119.6%70++63013.7%80++9709.3%
Rodney BullardMSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 43 ydsMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct24% of receiving production back price steady
15+-84089.4%25+-30875.5%40+-11453.3%50++14640.7%60++23429.9%70++34922.3%80++52016.1%90++75011.8%100++10608.6%
Aidan ChilesNWAnytime TD
64.3% to scoredrifted -195 → -180
Over-18064.3%
Alessio MilivojevicMSUAnytime TD
24.4% to scoreMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+31024.4%
Alex HonigNWAnytime TD
20% to scorebet up +450 → +400
Over+40020%
Brandon TullisMSUAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Caleb KomolafeNWAnytime TD
62.3% to score price steady
Over-16562.3%
Chrishon McCrayMSUAnytime TD
27.8% to scoreMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+26027.8%
Drew WagnerNWAnytime TD
35.7% to scorebet up +210 → +180
Over+18035.7%
Fredrick MooreMSUAnytime TD
29% to scoreMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+24529%
Gavin SawchukNWAnytime TD
47.6% to score price steady
Over+11047.6%
Griffin WildeNWAnytime TD
35.7% to scorebet up +205 → +180
Over+18035.7%
Hayden EligonNWAnytime TD
10% to score price steady
Over+90010%
Jayden SavouryMSUAnytime TD
20.8% to scoreMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+38020.8%
Jaziun PattersonMSUAnytime TD
70.1% to scoreMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over-23570.1%
Joseph HimonNWAnytime TD
39.2% to score price steady
Over+15539.2%
Luke DehnickeNWAnytime TD
16.7% to score price steady
Over+50016.7%
Marvis ParrishMSUAnytime TD
34.5% to scoreMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct21% of overall production backbet up +205 → +190
Over+19034.5%
Michigan State D/STAnytime TD
13.3% to scoredrifted +500 → +650
Over+65013.3%
Northwestern D/STAnytime TD
16.7% to scoredrifted +425 → +500
Over+50016.7%
Ricky AhumaraezeNWAnytime TD
18.2% to score price steady
Over+45018.2%
Rodney BullardMSUAnytime TD
30.8% to scoreMSU implied 20.5 pts · underdogNorthwestern D was soft — 15th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+22530.8%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.