College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 836 players across 35 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Memphis vs Tulane

Fri 7:30 PM ETtotal 55.534 props

Marcus StokesMEMPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 240 ydsMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct2% of passing production back price steady
150+-90090%160+-69087.3%170+-52383.9%180+-40480.2%190+-31876.1%200+-24871.3%210+-19666.2%220+-15660.9%230+-12355.2%231+-11553.5%234+-11353.1%240++10149.8%250++12444.6%260++15239.7%270++18834.7%280++23230.1%290++28825.8%300++35721.9%310++44618.3%320++55015.4%330++69012.7%340++88010.2%350++11208.2%
Jaylin CarterMEMRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 92 ydsMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct0% of rushing production backdrifted -112 → -105
40+-120092.3%50+-58385.4%60+-34477.5%70+-22068.8%80+-15060%87+-11653.7%88+-11854.1%90+-10551.2%100++13143.3%110++17636.2%120++23330%130++30924.4%140++40020%150++51916.2%160++66013.2%170++84010.6%180++10808.5%190++12407.5%
Kadin SemonzaTULNPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 174 ydsTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct0% of passing production back price steady
150+-16762.5%160+-13557.4%167+-11753.9%170+-10952.2%180++11346.9%190++14041.7%200++17436.5%210++21731.5%220++27027%230++33922.8%240++42219.2%250++52216.1%260++66013.2%270++83010.8%280++10608.6%
Manny CoveyMEMRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 49 ydsMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct0% of rushing production backbet up +121 → +104
15+-194095.1%20+-93090.3%25+-52383.9%30+-33076.7%40+-16562.3%44+-13357.1%45+-11653.7%50++10449%60++16837.3%70++25927.9%80++38920.4%90++56615%100++81011%110++11408.1%
Marcus StokesMEMRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 36 ydsMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct0% of rushing production back price steady
10+-142093.4%15+-59085.5%20+-32976.7%25+-20967.6%30+-14258.7%32+-12455.4%33+-12054.5%40++13342.9%50++23230.1%60++39120.4%70++61014.1%80++9209.8%90++12607.4%
Destyn HillTULNReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 45 ydsTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct28% of receiving production back price steady
15+-108091.5%25+-36678.5%36+-11353.1%40+-13256.9%42+-11854.1%43+-11252.8%50++12744.1%60++20233.1%70++30524.7%80++45618%90++66013.2%100++9609.4%
Jermane HayesMEMReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 45 ydsMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
15+-90090%25+-31876.1%40+-11653.7%41+-11052.4%42+-12154.8%50++14241.3%60++22930.4%70++34922.3%80++52516%90++75011.8%100++10808.5%
Tychaun ChapmanMEMReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 38 ydsMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct11% of receiving production backdrifted -126 → -116
15+-57085.1%25+-22469.1%35+-11653.7%36+-12255%40++11746.1%50++19234.2%60++30124.9%70++45418.1%80++67013%90++10208.9%100++12607.4%
Stonka BurnsideMEMReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 38 ydsMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
15+-62086.1%25+-23670.2%35+-11453.3%36+-11353.1%40++11247.2%50++18235.5%60++28825.8%70++44318.4%80++67013%90++9809.3%
Aidan O'CallaghanMEMAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Alante BrownMEMAnytime TD
12.5% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production back price steady
Over+70012.5%
Anthony Brown-StephensTULNAnytime TD
32.8% to scoreTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+20532.8%
Brady KluseMEMAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Bredell RichardsonTULNAnytime TD
13.3% to scoreTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+65013.3%
Cash SemonzaTULNAnytime TD
11.8% to scoreTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+75011.8%
Dallan HaydenMEMAnytime TD
32.8% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production backbet up +220 → +205
Over+20532.8%
Dawson JohnsonTULNAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+60014.3%
Destyn HillTULNAnytime TD
25.6% to scoreTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+29025.6%
Garrett MmahatTULNAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+60014.3%
Hunter TiptonMEMAnytime TD
45.5% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production back price steady
Over+12045.5%
Jaylin CarterMEMAnytime TD
70.1% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production backbet up -215 → -235
Over-23570.1%
Jaylin LucasTULNAnytime TD
53.5% to scoreTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct21% of overall production backbet up -105 → -115
Over-11553.5%
Jemyri DavisMEMAnytime TD
20.4% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production back price steady
Over+39020.4%
Jermane HayesMEMAnytime TD
42.6% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production back price steady
Over+13542.6%
Johnnie DanielsTULNAnytime TD
60.8% to scoreTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct21% of overall production backbet up -145 → -155
Over-15560.8%
Kadin SemonzaTULNAnytime TD
42.6% to scoreTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct21% of overall production backbet up +145 → +135
Over+13542.6%
Manny CoveyMEMAnytime TD
38.5% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production back price steady
Over+16038.5%
Marcus StokesMEMAnytime TD
40% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production backbet up +160 → +150
Over+15040%
Maurice TurnerTULNAnytime TD
43.5% to scoreTULN implied 24.3 pts · underdogMemphis D was middling — 52th pct21% of overall production backbet up +140 → +130
Over+13043.5%
Memphis D/STAnytime TD
18.2% to score price steady
Over+45018.2%
Stonka BurnsideMEMAnytime TD
27.4% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production back price steady
Over+26527.4%
Terrell TimmonsMEMAnytime TD
12.5% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production back price steady
Over+70012.5%
Tulane D/STAnytime TD
15.4% to score price steady
Over+55015.4%
Tychaun ChapmanMEMAnytime TD
37% to scoreMEM implied 31.3 pts · favouredTulane D was soft — 18th pct6% of overall production back price steady
Over+17037%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.