College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 836 players across 35 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Mississippi State vs LSU

Sat 12:00 PM ETtotal 57.533 props

Sam LeavittLSUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 261 ydsLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct13% of passing production back price steady
150+-172094.5%160+-124092.5%170+-93090.3%180+-70087.5%190+-52584%200+-41180.4%210+-32176.2%220+-25571.8%230+-20367%240+-16261.8%250+-13056.5%255+-11553.5%256+-11854.1%260+-10350.7%270++11945.7%280++14840.3%290++18435.2%300++22930.4%310++28725.8%320++35621.9%330++44918.2%340++56115.1%350++71012.3%360++90010%370++11607.9%
Dilin JonesLSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 95 ydsLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct40% of rushing production back price steady
40+-132093%50+-67087%60+-38779.5%70+-24871.3%80+-16862.7%89+-11653.7%90+-11854.1%100++11646.3%110++15738.9%120++20632.7%130++26927.1%140++35222.1%150++45018.2%160++58114.7%170++74011.9%180++9409.6%190++11607.9%
Anthony EvansMSSTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 70 ydsMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct28% of receiving production back price steady
25+-198095.2%40+-47582.6%50+-25471.8%60+-15360.5%67+-11353.1%68+-11553.5%70++10050%80++14840.3%90++21032.3%100++29725.2%110++40919.6%120++55015.4%130++74011.9%140++9809.3%150++12807.2%
Winston WatkinsLSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 66 ydsLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct20% of receiving production back price steady
25+-126092.6%40+-35177.8%50+-19866.4%60+-12355.2%61+-11753.9%62+-11954.3%70++12544.4%80++18335.3%90++26427.5%100++36521.5%110++50516.5%120++69012.7%130++9409.6%140++12207.6%
Sam LeavittLSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 43 ydsLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct40% of rushing production back price steady
10+-300096.8%15+-116092.1%20+-57685.2%25+-34577.5%30+-22869.5%39+-11753.9%40+-11854.1%50++14740.5%60++23929.5%70++37221.2%80++56815%90++82010.9%100++11807.8%
Jackson HarrisLSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 56 ydsLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct20% of receiving production back price steady
15+-250096.2%25+-69087.3%40+-22369%50+-12956.3%51+-12355.2%60++12245%70++18535.1%80++27326.8%90++39420.2%100++56315.1%110++78011.4%120++10808.5%
Sanfrisco MageeMSSTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 39 ydsMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct28% of receiving production back price steady
15+-67087%25+-25371.7%36+-11854.1%37+-11353.1%40++10548.8%50++17336.6%60++27726.5%70++42319.1%80++63013.7%90++9309.7%
Zion RaginsMSSTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 36 ydsMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct28% of receiving production back price steady
15+-51683.8%25+-21267.9%34+-11353.1%40++12544.4%50++20732.6%60++32723.4%70++49316.9%80++73012%90++10608.6%
Dilin JonesLSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 18 ydsLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct20% of receiving production back price steady
15+-13357.1%16+-12355.2%17+-11052.4%25++16038.5%40++41119.6%50++69012.7%60++11208.2%
Anthony EvansMSSTAnytime TD
40% to scoreMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct34% of overall production backdrifted +115 → +150
Over+15040%
Corey Barber Jr.LSUAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +370 → +500
Over+50016.7%
Dilin JonesLSUAnytime TD
75.6% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production backbet up -255 → -310
Over-31075.6%
Eugene WilsonLSUAnytime TD
31.7% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+21531.7%
Fluff BothwellMSSTAnytime TD
56.5% to scoreMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct34% of overall production backdrifted -160 → -130
Over-13056.5%
Harlem BerryLSUAnytime TD
31.7% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+21531.7%
Jackson HarrisLSUAnytime TD
37.7% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over+16537.7%
Jayce BrownLSUAnytime TD
26.7% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production backbet up +450 → +275
Over+27526.7%
Kamario TaylorMSSTAnytime TD
40.8% to scoreMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct34% of overall production backdrifted +115 → +145
Over+14540.8%
Kolin WilsonMSSTAnytime TD
35.1% to scoreMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct34% of overall production back price steady
Over+18535.1%
Landen ClarkLSUAnytime TD
31.7% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +150 → +215
Over+21531.7%
LSU D/STAnytime TD
20.8% to score price steady
Over+38020.8%
Marquis JohnsonMSSTAnytime TD
18.2% to scoreMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct34% of overall production backdrifted +320 → +450
Over+45018.2%
Mississippi State D/STAnytime TD
13.3% to scoredrifted +500 → +650
Over+65013.3%
Roman MothershedLSUAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +350 → +500
Over+50016.7%
Sam LeavittLSUAnytime TD
67.7% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production back price steady
Over-21067.7%
Sam WestMSSTAnytime TD
10.5% to scoreMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct34% of overall production backdrifted +600 → +850
Over+85010.5%
Sanfrisco MageeMSSTAnytime TD
23.8% to scoreMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct34% of overall production backdrifted +235 → +320
Over+32023.8%
Scott Starzykfgm
price steady
2++10548.8%
Stacy GageLSUAnytime TD
21.7% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +265 → +360
Over+36021.7%
Winston WatkinsLSUAnytime TD
47.6% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production backbet up +130 → +110
Over+11047.6%
Xavier GaytenMSSTAnytime TD
15.4% to scoreMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct34% of overall production back price steady
Over+55015.4%
Zach GraceLSUAnytime TD
20% to scoreLSU implied 36 pts · favouredMississippi State D was soft — 25th pct21% of overall production backdrifted +290 → +400
Over+40020%
Zion RaginsMSSTAnytime TD
21.3% to scoreMSST implied 21.5 pts · underdogLSU D was tough — 79th pct34% of overall production backdrifted +265 → +370
Over+37021.3%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.