College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 836 players across 35 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Wake Forest vs California

Sat 10:30 PM ETtotal 53.534 props

Gio LopezWAKEPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 273 ydsWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct23% of passing production back price steady
150+-250096.2%160+-174094.6%170+-124092.5%180+-92090.2%190+-70087.5%200+-52784.1%210+-41080.4%220+-32276.3%230+-25571.8%240+-20367%250+-16362%260+-13256.9%264+-11854.1%265+-11954.3%268+-11753.9%269+-11553.5%270+-10651.5%280++11646.3%290++14441%300++18035.7%310++22430.9%320++27826.5%330++34622.4%340++43318.8%350++55215.3%360++69012.7%370++86010.4%380++10608.6%390++12607.4%
Carlos HernandezWAKEReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 106 ydsWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct13% of receiving production back price steady
50+-138093.2%60+-69087.3%70+-40480.2%80+-25471.8%90+-17163.1%99+-12054.5%100+-12054.5%101+-12255%110++11646.3%120++16038.5%130++21731.5%140++28825.8%150++38120.8%160++50016.7%170++65013.3%180++85010.5%190++11008.3%
Deuce LawrenceWAKERushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 52 ydsWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct5% of rushing production back price steady
15+-250096.2%20+-110091.7%25+-63086.3%30+-39079.6%40+-19065.5%48+-12154.8%50+-10851.9%60++14840.3%70++22730.6%80++34122.7%90++49316.9%100++71012.3%110++9909.2%
Ian StrongCALReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 69 ydsCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct43% of receiving production back price steady
25+-178094.7%40+-44181.5%50+-24170.7%60+-14659.3%66+-11252.8%70++10449%80++15040%90++21331.9%100++30124.9%110++42119.2%120++57714.8%130++79011.2%140++10808.5%
Ty Clark IIIWAKERushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 57 ydsWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct5% of rushing production back price steady
20+-152093.8%25+-80088.9%30+-50083.3%40+-24370.8%50+-13858%54+-11353.1%60++11746.1%70++17436.5%80++26027.8%90++37121.2%100++52416%110++74011.9%120++10608.6%
Chase HendricksCALReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 54 ydsCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct43% of receiving production back price steady
15+-230095.8%25+-63086.3%40+-20867.5%50+-12054.5%51+-11453.3%60++13342.9%70++20133.2%80++29825.1%90++42719%100++60014.3%110++85010.5%120++12007.7%
Gio LopezWAKERushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 31 ydsWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct5% of rushing production back price steady
10+-92090.2%15+-41880.7%20+-24170.7%25+-15560.8%28+-12555.6%30+-10851.9%40++17336.6%50++30424.8%60++50516.5%70++79011.2%80++12207.6%
Jack FoleyWAKEReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 52 ydsWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct13% of receiving production back price steady
15+-194095.1%25+-56484.9%40+-18364.7%47+-12555.6%50+-10751.7%60++14740.5%70++22530.8%80++32923.3%90++46917.6%100++68012.8%110++9709.3%
Mason MiniCALReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 30 ydsCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct43% of receiving production back price steady
15+-31075.6%25+-13457.3%27+-11753.9%40++18734.8%50++31224.3%60++49016.9%70++76011.6%80++11408.1%
Antonio MeeksWAKEReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 27 ydsWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct13% of receiving production back price steady
15+-25071.4%24+-11854.1%25+-11052.4%40++22830.5%50++38020.8%60++61014.1%70++9409.6%
Adam MohammedCALAnytime TD
44.4% to scoreCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
Over+12544.4%
Anthony LeagueCALAnytime TD
19% to scoreCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
Over+42519%
Antonio MeeksWAKEAnytime TD
20.4% to scoreWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Over+39020.4%
Ashten EmoryCALAnytime TD
50% to scoreCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
Over+10050%
California D/STAnytime TD
16.7% to score price steady
Over+50016.7%
Carlos HernandezWAKEAnytime TD
50% to scoreWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Over+10050%
Chase HendricksCALAnytime TD
41.7% to scoreCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
Over+14041.7%
Cooper PerryCALAnytime TD
20% to scoreCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
Over+40020%
Deuce LawrenceWAKEAnytime TD
57.4% to scoreWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Over-13557.4%
Drayden DickmannWAKEAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Gio LopezWAKEAnytime TD
70.6% to scoreWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Over-24070.6%
Ian StrongCALAnytime TD
39.2% to scoreCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
Over+15539.2%
Jack FoleyWAKEAnytime TD
28.2% to scoreWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Over+25528.2%
Jackson BrousseauCALAnytime TD
12.5% to scoreCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
Over+70012.5%
Jamar SearcyWAKEAnytime TD
21.7% to scoreWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Over+36021.7%
Jordan KingCALAnytime TD
19% to scoreCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
Over+42519%
Kam ShanksWAKEAnytime TD
23.8% to scoreWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Over+32023.8%
Kamrean JohnsonWAKEAnytime TD
12.5% to scoreWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Over+70012.5%
Kyion GrayesCALAnytime TD
19% to scoreCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
Over+42519%
Mason MiniCALAnytime TD
28.2% to scoreCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
Over+25528.2%
Taimane PurcellCALAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreCAL implied 22.5 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Ty Clark IIIWAKEAnytime TD
56.5% to scoreWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Over-13056.5%
Wake Forest D/STAnytime TD
19% to score price steady
Over+42519%
Will LoerzelWAKEAnytime TD
12.5% to scoreWAKE implied 31 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Over+70012.5%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.