College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 836 players across 35 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Virginia vs SMU

Sat 12:00 PM ETtotal 51.536 props

Kevin JenningsSMUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 289 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct97% of passing production back price steady
160+-310096.9%170+-220095.7%180+-152093.8%190+-112091.8%200+-84089.4%210+-64086.5%220+-48682.9%230+-37979.1%240+-29774.8%250+-23770.3%260+-19065.5%270+-15160.2%274+-11954.3%279+-11653.7%280+-11954.3%281+-11753.9%290++10249.5%300++12843.9%310++15938.6%320++19733.7%330++24229.2%340++30524.7%350++38120.8%360++47717.3%370++59314.4%380++76011.6%390++9709.3%400++12607.4%
Beau PribulaUVAPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 190 ydsUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct1% of passing production backbet up +112 → +100
150+-24070.6%160+-19365.9%170+-15460.6%177+-11753.9%178+-11553.5%180+-12355.2%181+-11553.5%183+-11653.7%190++10050%200++12344.8%210++15339.5%220++19034.5%230++23629.8%240++29325.4%250++36621.5%260++46117.8%270++58414.6%280++73012%290++9209.8%300++11807.8%
Jekail MiddlebrookUVARushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 78 ydsUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct21% of rushing production back price steady
25+-290096.7%30+-156094%40+-64086.5%50+-32976.7%60+-20266.9%70+-13156.7%71+-12054.5%72+-11252.8%73+-11653.7%74+-11854.1%80++11247.2%90++15938.6%100++21831.4%110++29725.2%120++39920%130++52915.9%140++69012.7%150++9109.9%160++12407.5%
Kendrick RaphaelSMURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 96 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct1% of rushing production backbet up +162 → +114
30+-240096%40+-140093.3%50+-70087.5%60+-39679.8%70+-25471.8%80+-17163.1%81+-11854.1%90+-12054.5%91+-11753.9%100++11446.7%110++15339.5%120++20333%130++26727.2%140++33822.8%150++44018.5%160++56415.1%170++73012%180++9109.9%190++11807.8%
Yamir KnightSMUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 60 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct37% of receiving production back price steady
25+-93090.3%40+-28474%50+-16061.5%54+-11854.1%55+-11954.3%56+-12154.8%60+-10150.2%70++15040%80++22530.8%90++31624%100++44418.4%110++62013.9%120++86010.4%130++11607.9%
Jalen CooperSMUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 48 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct37% of receiving production back price steady
15+-130092.9%25+-41580.6%40+-15060%42+-12856.1%43+-11152.6%44+-12154.8%50++11247.2%60++17536.4%70++26327.5%80++38820.5%90++57314.9%100++81011%110++11408.1%
Yannick SmithSMUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 52 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct37% of receiving production back price steady
15+-192095%25+-55384.7%40+-18865.3%48+-12255%49+-11553.5%50+-11052.4%60++14341.2%70++21631.6%80++31823.9%90++45418.1%100++64013.5%110++90010%120++12407.5%
DaShawn MartinUVAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 39 ydsUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct9% of receiving production backdrifted -101 → +111
15+-61085.9%25+-23770.3%35+-11653.7%36+-11453.3%38+-11854.1%40++11147.4%50++18535.1%60++29825.1%70++44818.2%80++67013%90++9609.4%100++12407.5%
Kameron CourtneyUVAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 35 ydsUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct9% of receiving production back price steady
15+-41780.7%25+-17263.2%31+-11653.7%32+-11353.1%33+-11252.8%40++14640.7%50++24329.2%60++39020.4%70++60014.3%80++90010%90++11408.1%
Beau PribulaUVARushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 19 ydsUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct21% of rushing production backbet up +130 → +107
10+-27473.3%15+-15060%16+-12255%17+-12355.2%20++10748.3%25++15938.6%30++22730.6%40++41019.6%50++70012.5%60++11208.2%
Randy PittmanSMUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 32 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct37% of receiving production back price steady
15+-31776%25+-13457.3%26+-12455.4%27+-11653.7%29+-12054.5%40++18535.1%50++31024.4%60++49416.8%70++77011.5%80++11408.1%
Kendrick RaphaelSMUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 20 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct37% of receiving production back price steady
15+-15160.2%18+-11753.9%25++14241.3%40++35921.8%50++61014.1%60++10009.1%
Beau PribulaUVAAnytime TD
28.6% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+25028.6%
Dakota TwittyUVAAnytime TD
15.4% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+55015.4%
DaShawn MartinUVAAnytime TD
36.4% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+17536.4%
Derrick McFallSMUAnytime TD
38.5% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production backbet up +245 → +160
Over+16038.5%
Dramekco GreenSMUAnytime TD
36.4% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+17536.4%
Jacquon GibsonUVAAnytime TD
23.3% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production backbet up +360 → +330
Over+33023.3%
Jalen CooperSMUAnytime TD
38.5% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production backbet up +175 → +160
Over+16038.5%
Jalen HaleSMUAnytime TD
23.8% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production backbet up +360 → +320
Over+32023.8%
Jekail MiddlebrookUVAAnytime TD
45.5% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+12045.5%
John RogersUVAAnytime TD
11.1% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+80011.1%
Kameron CourtneyUVAAnytime TD
32.3% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production backbet up +235 → +210
Over+21032.3%
Kendrick RaphaelSMUAnytime TD
71% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production backbet up -205 → -245
Over-24571%
Kevin JenningsSMUAnytime TD
38.5% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+16038.5%
Noah VaughnUVAAnytime TD
20% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+40020%
Randy PittmanSMUAnytime TD
37.7% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+16537.7%
Rico Flores Jr.UVAAnytime TD
25.3% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+29525.3%
SMU D/STAnytime TD
16.7% to scoredrifted +400 → +500
Over+50016.7%
Theo Melin OhrstromSMUAnytime TD
33.9% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production backbet up +215 → +195
Over+19533.9%
TyLyric ColemanUVAAnytime TD
17.4% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+47517.4%
Virginia D/STAnytime TD
16.7% to score price steady
Over+50016.7%
Xavier BrownUVAAnytime TD
31.3% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+22031.3%
Xay DavisUVAAnytime TD
30.3% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+23030.3%
Yamir KnightSMUAnytime TD
47.6% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+11047.6%
Yannick SmithSMUAnytime TD
35.7% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production backbet up +195 → +180
Over+18035.7%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.