College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 836 players across 35 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Nebraska vs Oregon

Sat 11:00 PM ETtotal 52.515 props

Anthony ColandreaNEBPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 217 ydsNEB implied 22.5 pts · underdogOregon D was tough — 92th pct5% of passing production backbet up +122 → +111
150+-44781.7%160+-35177.8%170+-27673.4%180+-22168.8%190+-17463.5%200+-14158.5%203+-11753.9%208+-11854.1%209+-11653.7%210+-11353.1%211+-11753.9%212+-11954.3%220++11147.4%230++13842%240++17136.9%250++21331.9%260++26127.7%270++32623.5%280++40819.7%290++51316.3%300++65013.3%310++83010.8%320++10408.8%330++12807.2%
Jordon DavisonORERushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 81 ydsORE implied 30 pts · favouredNebraska D was middling — 36th pct68% of rushing production backbet up +102 → -105
30+-192095%40+-76088.4%50+-39879.9%60+-23770.3%70+-15460.6%74+-12154.8%75+-12054.5%76+-11653.7%77+-11753.9%80+-10551.2%90++13442.7%100++18535.1%110++25428.2%120++34322.6%130++45318.1%140++59514.4%150++77011.5%160++9909.2%170++12607.4%
Dierre HillORERushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 76 ydsORE implied 30 pts · favouredNebraska D was middling — 36th pct68% of rushing production back price steady
25+-280096.6%30+-144093.5%40+-59585.6%50+-32076.2%60+-19065.5%68+-12255%69+-12255%70+-12655.8%71+-12154.8%80++11945.7%90++16837.3%100++23429.9%110++31724%120++42619%130++57014.9%140++76011.6%150++9909.2%
Evan StewartOREReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 67 ydsORE implied 30 pts · favouredNebraska D was middling — 36th pct64% of receiving production back price steady
25+-134093.1%40+-36378.4%50+-20467.1%60+-12655.8%61+-11653.7%62+-11553.5%63+-11854.1%64+-11553.5%70++12145.2%80++17736.1%90++25528.2%100++36421.6%110++50816.4%120++70012.5%130++9409.6%140++12607.4%
Kwazi GilmerNEBReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 67 ydsNEB implied 22.5 pts · underdogOregon D was tough — 92th pct74% of receiving production back price steady
25+-140093.3%40+-38079.2%50+-20767.4%60+-12755.9%62+-11753.9%63+-11653.7%64+-11553.5%65+-11553.5%70++12045.5%80++17836%90++25528.2%100++35821.8%110++50016.7%120++68012.8%130++9109.9%140++12207.6%
Anthony ColandreaNEBRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 38 ydsNEB implied 22.5 pts · underdogOregon D was tough — 92th pct30% of rushing production back price steady
10+-172094.5%15+-68087.2%20+-37078.7%25+-23169.8%30+-15660.9%33+-11854.1%34+-11854.1%35+-11954.3%36+-11954.3%40++12145.2%50++20732.6%60++33223.1%70++52815.9%80++80011.1%90++11408.1%
Jamal RuleNEBRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 49 ydsNEB implied 22.5 pts · underdogOregon D was tough — 92th pct30% of rushing production backdrifted -110 → +112
15+-174094.6%20+-83089.2%25+-47582.6%30+-30375.2%40+-15560.8%45+-11854.1%46+-11553.5%47+-12956.3%50++11247.2%60++18135.6%70++28326.1%80++42619%90++63013.7%100++90010%110++12807.2%
Jamari JohnsonOREReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 58 ydsORE implied 30 pts · favouredNebraska D was middling — 36th pct64% of receiving production back price steady
15+-300096.8%25+-83089.2%40+-26072.2%50+-14959.8%53+-12154.8%54+-12255%60++10748.3%70++16338%80++24429.1%90++35022.2%100++50116.6%110++70012.5%120++9709.3%130++12407.5%
Dakorien MooreOREReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 50 ydsORE implied 30 pts · favouredNebraska D was middling — 36th pct64% of receiving production back price steady
15+-160094.1%25+-50183.4%40+-17263.2%46+-12655.8%47+-11753.9%48+-10651.5%50+-10150.2%60++15738.9%70++23829.6%80++35122.2%90++49816.7%100++73012%110++10009.1%
Jacory BarneyNEBReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 44 ydsNEB implied 22.5 pts · underdogOregon D was tough — 92th pct74% of receiving production back price steady
15+-89089.9%25+-31876.1%39+-11252.8%40+-11954.3%41+-12154.8%50++14141.5%60++22131.2%70++33622.9%80++49316.9%90++72012.2%100++10608.6%
Messiah HamptonOREReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 43 ydsORE implied 30 pts · favouredNebraska D was middling — 36th pct64% of receiving production back price steady
15+-88089.8%25+-31475.8%40+-11653.7%41+-11052.4%50++14441%60++22730.6%70++34522.5%80++51316.3%90++74011.9%100++10608.6%110++12207.6%
Luke LindenmeyerNEBReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 29 ydsNEB implied 22.5 pts · underdogOregon D was tough — 92th pct74% of receiving production back price steady
15+-28874.2%25+-12655.8%26+-11854.1%27+-11453.3%40++20033.3%50++33223.1%60++53415.8%70++83010.8%80++12607.4%
Nyziah HunterNEBReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 30 ydsNEB implied 22.5 pts · underdogOregon D was tough — 92th pct74% of receiving production back price steady
15+-30875.5%25+-13557.4%27+-11854.1%28+-11653.7%40++18435.2%50++30624.6%60++49016.9%70++76011.6%80++11607.9%
Dierre HillOREReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 19 ydsORE implied 30 pts · favouredNebraska D was middling — 36th pct64% of receiving production back price steady
15+-13858%17+-11753.9%18+-11252.8%25++15539.2%40++39020.4%50++68012.8%60++11208.2%
Gage Hurychfgm
price steady
1+-20066.7%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.