College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 836 players across 35 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Arizona State vs Texas Tech

Sat 3:30 PM ETtotal 48.536 props

Will HammondTTUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 235 ydsTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct27% of passing production backdrifted -115 → -107
150+-69087.3%160+-53584.3%170+-41580.6%180+-32276.3%190+-25671.9%200+-20667.3%210+-16562.3%220+-13256.9%225+-11854.1%226+-11753.9%227+-11854.1%228+-11954.3%229+-11653.7%230+-10751.7%231+-11553.5%240++11646.3%250++14341.2%260++17736.1%270++21731.5%280++27127%290++33922.8%300++42019.2%310++52715.9%320++65013.3%330++84010.6%340++10608.6%350++11807.8%
Cutter BoleyASUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 221 ydsASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct5% of passing production backbet up +144 → -103
150+-49083.1%160+-38179.2%170+-30575.3%180+-24170.7%190+-19065.5%195+-11854.1%196+-11854.1%197+-11753.9%198+-11453.3%200+-15260.3%201+-11453.3%210+-12755.9%212+-11753.9%213+-11453.3%220+-10350.7%230++11945.7%240++14640.7%250++19134.4%260++23729.7%270++29125.6%280++36521.5%290++45917.9%300++58914.5%310++75011.8%320++9409.6%330++11807.8%
J'Koby WilliamsTTURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 97 ydsTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct99% of rushing production back price steady
25+-310096.9%30+-240096%40+-128092.8%50+-64086.5%60+-36278.4%70+-23370%73+-12154.8%78+-11854.1%80+-15861.2%81+-11954.3%89+-11653.7%90+-11252.8%91+-11453.3%93+-11353.1%96+-11152.6%100++12245%110++16238.2%120++21631.6%130++28526%140++37021.3%150++48217.2%160++61014.1%170++79011.2%180++9809.3%190++12407.5%200++12007.7%
Reed HarrisASUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 88 ydsASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct31% of receiving production back price steady
40+-102091.1%50+-50283.4%60+-28674.1%70+-17964.2%76+-12355.2%80+-11854.1%81+-12054.5%83+-11753.9%84+-11353.1%85+-12655.8%86+-12054.5%90++12145.2%100++16737.5%110++22930.4%120++31624%130++42619%140++57714.8%150++77011.5%160++10009.1%170++12807.2%
Omarion MillerASUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 46 ydsASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct31% of receiving production back price steady
15+-99090.8%25+-34977.7%40+-12255%41+-11252.8%42+-10952.2%44+-12255%50++13842%53+-12355.2%54+-11553.5%55+-11653.7%60++21631.6%70++32923.3%80++48117.2%90++69012.7%100++9709.3%110++11208.2%120++9509.5%130++12607.4%
Kenny JohnsonTTUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 59 ydsTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct57% of receiving production back price steady
15+-250096.2%25+-70087.5%40+-22669.3%49+-12255%50+-13156.7%51+-12455.4%52+-12555.6%57+-12255%58+-11653.7%60++12344.8%70++18635%80++27526.7%90++39920%100++57114.9%110++78011.4%120++10808.5%130++11208.2%
Quinten JoynerTTURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 60 ydsTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct99% of rushing production back price steady
20+-196095.1%25+-104091.2%30+-62086.1%40+-29074.4%50+-16462.1%55+-11252.8%56+-12755.9%57+-11653.7%58+-12154.8%60+-10250.5%70++15040%80++22131.2%90++31823.9%100++44318.4%110++61014.1%120++86010.4%130++12007.7%
Cameron DickeyTTURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 66 ydsTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct99% of rushing production back price steady
20+-310096.9%25+-152093.8%30+-89089.9%40+-40180%50+-22068.8%60+-13256.9%61+-12355.2%62+-12154.8%70++11646.3%80++17037%90++24529%100++34122.7%110++47017.5%120++65013.3%130++89010.1%140++12207.6%
Kyson BrownASURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 34 ydsASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct-5% of rushing production backdrifted -128 → -111
10+-106091.4%15+-45582%20+-25671.9%25+-16462.1%29+-12054.5%30+-11152.6%31+-11854.1%32+-12255%40++16937.2%50++28625.9%60++46417.7%70++73012%80++11008.3%
Coy EakinTTUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 40 ydsTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct57% of receiving production back price steady
15+-67087%25+-25371.7%36+-11653.7%37+-11553.5%38+-11753.9%40++10349.3%50++17636.2%60++27526.7%70++41219.5%80++62013.9%90++9109.9%100++12207.6%
J'Koby WilliamsTTUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 29 ydsTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct57% of receiving production backdrifted -125 → -113
15+-28273.8%22+-11453.3%23+-11653.7%24+-11753.9%25+-12255%26+-11353.1%27+-11753.9%40++20233.1%50++33323.1%60++53415.8%70++83010.8%80++12807.2%
Terrance CarterTTUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 40 ydsTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct57% of receiving production back price steady
15+-71087.7%25+-26572.6%37+-12054.5%38+-11252.8%39+-11453.3%40++10050%50++16737.5%60++26027.8%70++39120.4%80++58214.7%90++84010.6%100++12007.7%
Will HammondTTURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 17 ydsTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct99% of rushing production backdrifted -121 → -112
10+-21668.4%15+-12455.4%16+-11252.8%20++12744.1%25++18335.3%30++25528.2%40++45418.1%50++78011.4%60++12407.5%
Micah HudsonTTUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 21 ydsTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct57% of receiving production back price steady
15+-15660.9%18+-11353.1%19+-11052.4%20+-11052.4%25++14041.7%40++34122.7%50++58814.5%60++9809.3%
Carson SmithASUfgm
market midpoint ≈ 2 ASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct price steady
1+-29574.7%2++16537.7%
AJ IaASUAnytime TD
10% to scoreASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+90010%
Arizona State D/STAnytime TD
14.3% to scoredrifted +500 → +600
Over+60014.3%
Cardae MackASUAnytime TD
25% to scoreASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+30025%
Coy EakinTTUAnytime TD
35.1% to scoreTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
Over+18535.1%
Cutter BoleyASUAnytime TD
26.7% to scoreASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+27526.7%
J'Koby WilliamsTTUAnytime TD
83.3% to scoreTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
Over-50083.3%
Jalen JonesTTUAnytime TD
15.4% to scoreTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
Over+55015.4%
Jalen MossASUAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+11008.3%
Kenny JohnsonTTUAnytime TD
42.6% to scoreTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
Over+13542.6%
Kyson BrownASUAnytime TD
33.3% to scoreASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+20033.3%
Malcolm SimmonsTTUAnytime TD
15.4% to scoreTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
Over+55015.4%
Marquis GillisASUAnytime TD
17.4% to scoreASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+47517.4%
Micah HudsonTTUAnytime TD
20.8% to scoreTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
Over+38020.8%
Omarion MillerASUAnytime TD
39.2% to scoreASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+15539.2%
Quinten JoynerTTUAnytime TD
53.5% to scoreTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
Over-11553.5%
Raiden Vines-BrightASUAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Reed HarrisASUAnytime TD
45.5% to scoreASU implied 17 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+12045.5%
Stone Harringtonfgm
drifted +120 → +130
2++13043.5%
Terrance CarterTTUAnytime TD
35.7% to scoreTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
Over+18035.7%
Texas Tech D/STAnytime TD
22.2% to score price steady
Over+35022.2%
Will HammondTTUAnytime TD
32.8% to scoreTTU implied 31.5 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
Over+20532.8%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.