Bobby's Bets
Bobby's BetsMarch Madness
Bracket
Picks
Futures
Results
My Record
💸 Refer
Bobby's Bets — NCAA Tournament Analytics
LearnRefer & EarnMy RecordDiscordTwitter

Bobby's Bets publishes sports statistics and analysis for informational purposes only. Nothing here is a prediction of results or a recommendation to wager. Must be 21+ (18+ where permitted by law). Please play responsibly.

Problem gambling? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER — free, confidential, 24/7 — or visit ncpgambling.org.

Terms of Service·Disclaimer·Responsible Play

HubBracketPicksFuturesResults
NCAABBTournament Analysis

Tournament Analysis

Deep dive into teams, matchups, and tournament dynamics

Cinderella WatchDark horse teams with upset potential
Upset AlertGames most likely to produce upsets
Seed HistoryHistorical upset rates by seed matchup
Power RankingsTeam efficiency rankings by conference
Conference TrackerHow many teams each conference has in the field

Cinderella Watch

(32 dark horses)

Upset Alert

(0 candidates)

No upcoming upset candidates available yet. Check back once games are scheduled.

Historical Seed Matchup Rates

1 vs 161.2% upset rate

Only two 16-seeds have ever beaten a 1-seed: UMBC over Virginia (2018) and FDU over Purdue (2023). These remain the rarest upsets in tournament history.

2 vs 156.3% upset rate

15-seeds pull off an upset roughly once every two tournaments. Saint Peter's memorable 2022 run to the Elite Eight started with a 15-over-2 upset.

3 vs 1415.2% upset rate

14-seeds win about one in seven matchups. These upsets often come from mid-major conference champs with strong defensive identities.

4 vs 1321.5% upset rate

Over one in five 13-seeds advance. The 4-13 matchup is historically one of the most fertile grounds for bracket-busting picks.

5 vs 1235.4% upset rate

The classic upset pick. 12-seeds win more than a third of these games, making it the most popular Cinderella choice in bracket pools.

6 vs 1137.3% upset rate

11-seeds (including play-in winners) are historically dangerous. Loyola Chicago (2018) and VCU (2011) rode this seed to the Final Four.

7 vs 1039.2% upset rate

Nearly a coin flip. 10-seeds are often strong at-large teams that underperformed expectations during the regular season.

8 vs 948.7% upset rate

The closest to a true toss-up in the tournament. Seeding barely matters here -- pick the team you believe in.

Conference Tracker

(31 conferences in the field)
B
Big Ten
Big Ten10 bids
Auto:
M
Michigan
Michigan
At-Large:
P
Purdue
Purdue
I
Illinois
Illinois
M
Michigan State
Michigan State
I
Iowa
Iowa
N
Nebraska
Nebraska
W
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
O
Ohio State
Ohio State
U
UCLA
UCLA
I
Indiana
Indiana
10
S
SEC
SEC10 bids
Auto:
F
Florida
Florida
At-Large:
V
Vanderbilt
Vanderbilt
A
Arkansas
Arkansas
A
Alabama
Alabama
T
Tennessee
Tennessee
T
Texas
Texas
K
Kentucky
Kentucky
G
Georgia
Georgia
A
Auburn
Auburn
T
Texas A&M
Texas A&M
10
B
Big 12
Big 128 bids
Auto:
A
Arizona
Arizona
At-Large:
H
Houston
Houston
I
Iowa State
Iowa State
K
Kansas
Kansas
T
Texas Tech
Texas Tech
B
BYU
BYU
T
TCU
TCU
C
Cincinnati
Cincinnati
8
A
ACC
ACC7 bids
Auto:
D
Duke
Duke
At-Large:
V
Virginia
Virginia
L
Louisville
Louisville
N
North Carolina
North Carolina
M
Miami
Miami
C
Clemson
Clemson
N
NC State
NC State
7
B
Big East
Big East3 bids
Auto:
U
UConn
UConn
At-Large:
S
St. John's
St. John's
V
Villanova
Villanova
3
W
WCC
WCC3 bids
Auto:
G
Gonzaga
Gonzaga
At-Large:
S
Saint Mary's
Saint Mary's
S
Santa Clara
Santa Clara
3
A
A102 bids
Auto:
S
Saint Louis
At-Large:
V
VCU
VCU
2
A
Amer1 bid
Auto:
S
South Florida
South Florida
1
A
America East1 bid
Auto:
U
UMBC
1
A
ASUN
ASUN1 bid
Auto:
C
Central Arkansas
Central Arkansas
1
B
Big Sky
Big Sky1 bid
Auto:
M
Montana State
Montana State
1
B
Big South
Big South1 bid
Auto:
H
High Point
High Point
1
B
Bw1 bid
Auto:
S
San Diego
San Diego
1
C
C Usa1 bid
Auto:
S
Sam Houston
1
C
CAA
CAA1 bid
Auto:
H
Hofstra
1
H
Horizon
Horizon1 bid
Auto:
W
Wright
1
I
Ivy1 bid
Auto:
Y
Yale
Yale
1
M
Maac1 bid
Auto:
Q
Quinnipiac
1
M
Mac1 bid
Auto:
A
Akron
1
M
Meac1 bid
Auto:
N
Norfolk
1
M
MVC
MVC1 bid
Auto:
B
Belmont
1
M
MWC
MWC1 bid
Auto:
U
Utah
Utah
1
N
Nec1 bid
Auto:
L
Le Moyne
1
O
Ovc1 bid
Auto:
S
Southeast Missouri
1
P
Patriot
Patriot1 bid
Auto:
N
Navy
Navy
1
S
Sc1 bid
Auto:
E
ETSU
ETSU
1
S
Slnd1 bid
Auto:
M
McNeese
1
S
Summit
Summit1 bid
Auto:
S
St. Thomas
1
S
Sun Belt
Sun Belt1 bid
Auto:
A
Appalachian
1
S
Swac1 bid
Auto:
P
Prairie View A&M
1
W
Wac1 bid
Auto:
C
Cal
Cal
1

Power Rankings

(12 teams)
Conference:Top 5All MajorsACCACCBig TenBig TenSECSECBig 12Big 12Big EastBig EastAACAACMWCMWCWCCWCC
Sorted by Net Rating
#TeamConfNetPPGOpp PPGFG%3P%FT%RPGAPGStrengths
1South Florida
South Florida
AAC87.7-+87.743.933.274.442.717.2
Elite scoring offenseDominant on the boardsExcellent ball movement
2Tulsa
Tulsa
AAC85.6-+85.647.738.878.138.015.6
Elite scoring offenseEfficient shootingDangerous from three-point range
3FAU
FAU
AAC80.6-+80.645.735.168.937.914.8
Elite scoring offenseDisruptive with stealsStrong shot-blocking presence
4UAB
UAB
AAC79.2-+79.244.328.170.539.914.3
Strong scoring offenseDominant on the boards
5Wichita State
Wichita State
AAC77.6-+77.644.234.169.041.011.6
Strong scoring offenseDominant on the boards
6Memphis
Memphis
AAC75.2-+75.243.431.672.136.813.3
Strong scoring offenseDisruptive with steals
7Temple
Temple
AAC73.9-+73.944.733.874.733.712.3
8Rice
Rice
AAC73.9-+73.942.034.868.538.112.2
Dominant on the boards
9Tulane
Tulane
AAC72.4-+72.442.332.176.631.112.8
10East Carolina
East Carolina
AAC71.5-+71.541.928.870.436.511.8
11North Texas
North Texas
AAC70.9-+70.942.530.069.335.212.6
Disruptive with steals
12UTSA
UTSA
AAC69.5-+69.539.829.769.136.210.9
1
South Florida
South FloridaAAC
PPG87.7
Opp-
Net+87.7
FG%43.9
Elite scoring offenseDominant on the boards
2
Tulsa
TulsaAAC
PPG85.6
Opp-
Net+85.6
FG%47.7
Elite scoring offenseEfficient shooting
3
FAU
FAUAAC
PPG80.6
Opp-
Net+80.6
FG%45.7
Elite scoring offenseDisruptive with steals
4
UAB
UABAAC
PPG79.2
Opp-
Net+79.2
FG%44.3
Strong scoring offenseDominant on the boards
5
Wichita State
Wichita StateAAC
PPG77.6
Opp-
Net+77.6
FG%44.2
Strong scoring offenseDominant on the boards
6
Memphis
MemphisAAC
PPG75.2
Opp-
Net+75.2
FG%43.4
Strong scoring offenseDisruptive with steals
7
Temple
TempleAAC
PPG73.9
Opp-
Net+73.9
FG%44.7
8
Rice
RiceAAC
PPG73.9
Opp-
Net+73.9
FG%42.0
Dominant on the boards
9
Tulane
TulaneAAC
PPG72.4
Opp-
Net+72.4
FG%42.3
10
East Carolina
East CarolinaAAC
PPG71.5
Opp-
Net+71.5
FG%41.9
11
North Texas
North TexasAAC
PPG70.9
Opp-
Net+70.9
FG%42.5
Disruptive with steals
12
UTSA
UTSAAAC
PPG69.5
Opp-
Net+69.5
FG%39.8